Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "288kbit".
Did you mean:
2.8kbit
2005 Nov 07
9
has anyone tried adsl-optmizer kernel patches for dsl modems?
Hi
I''m using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect scheduling.
By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead in
the scheduling algorithms.
http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ADSL-optimizer/
Before trying it, has anyone tried these patches? they apply on 2.4.29
kernel and 2.6.9 TC. I use centos4 with a 2.6 kernel, so I can''t try
these easily.
Thanks
2006 Sep 16
1
Wondershaper Errors
...root
+ tc qdisc del dev ppp0 ingress
+ tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb default 20
+ tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 320kbit burst 6k
+ tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 320kbit burst
6k prio 1+ tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate
288kbit burst 6k prio 2+ tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30
htb rate 256kbit burst 6k prio 2+ tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:10
handle 10: sfq perturb 10
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument <----- 1''st error ------
+ tc qdisc add dev ppp0 parent 1:20 handle 20: sfq pertur...
2006 Jun 23
4
English translation of article on HFSC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Greetings all,
Working in concert with the original authors, Klaus Rechert and
Patrick McHardy, I have translated their article "HFSC Scheduling
mit Linux" [0] on Hierarchical Fair Service Curve (HFSC) into
English [1].
http://linux-ip.net/tc/hfsc.en/
Although the original content is not available directly from their
website,
2006 Feb 10
3
htb root don''t reach ceil rate?
Hello,
i have a htb setup where the root and (nearly) all child classes has a
ceil rate with max up from my adsl line. But the root class don''t reach
the ceil value but some childs are get a huge backlog.
My setup: (tc -d class show dev ppp0) [cleaned a bit]
********************************************************
class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 cburst
2006 Mar 02
33
Patch to allow for the ATM "cell tax"
I have been trying to optimise my ADSL connections for VOIP.
Funny things were happening - for example increasing the ping
packet size by 50% had no effect, but then adding one byte
had a major effect. It took me a while to figure out that I
was seeing the effects of the fixed ATM cell size.
This is probably obvious to some of you. For the rest: ADSL
uses ATM as its transport. An ATM