Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "28733a9b".
2015 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> Yeah, the function attributes section of LangRef is a reasonable place to
> put stuff like this:
> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#function-attributes
I'll see if I can't sneak something in there.
>
> I think we should add this. I also know that LLILAC needs something like
> this as
2015 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
...ple
fight over the definition of __probestack, or where users want to override
__probestack to call into their runtime, rather than dealing with signals.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150728/28733a9b/attachment.html>
2015 Jul 27
3
[LLVMdev] Adding a stack probe function attribute
Yeah, the function attributes section of LangRef is a reasonable place to
put stuff like this:
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#function-attributes
I think we should add this. I also know that LLILAC needs something like
this as well. I propose the following:
- Add a string attribute called "stack-probe-symbol"="foo".
- The presence of this attribute indicates that stack