search for: 28531

...d. Then five mins later it wont work, I'll get 'permission denied'. Looking at the winbindd log file, the system seems to suddenly flip from looking for user 'bloggs' to 'NOUSER': 2004/07/14 18:11:24, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_interface_version(261) [28531]: request interface version [2004/07/14 18:11:24, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_misc.c:winbindd_priv_pipe_dir(297) [28531]: request location of privileged pipe [2004/07/14 18:11:24, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_user.c:winbindd_getpwnam(122) [28531]: getpwnam bloggs [2004/07/14 18:11:24, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_...

...i32> <i32 0, i32 5, i32 6, i32 3> ret <4 x i32> %shuf } For the goal of canonicalization in IR, which of these should we prefer? Some backend / lowering differences for AArch64 and PPC are noted in: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28530 https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28531 x86 converts either form optimally in all cases I've looked at. This question first came up in D22114 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D22114 ) and is extended in D23886 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D23886 ) with a constant value example. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was...

...aunch <appname>'. So, however wine calls exec/execve/whatever to launch a native Linux executable, it appears to do it in such a way that the parent process doesn't know it is a child process. Linux knows that it's a child (from pstree): Steam.exe(28395)---test.exe(28530)---java(28531) also see ps: $ ps efo 'pid,ppid,comm' | egrep 'Steam|test|java' 28395 28373 \_ Steam.exe 28530 28395 \_ test.exe 28531 28530 \_ java Does anyone know why this happens, and how it might be corrected? Is it a fundamental incompatibility between the APIs for Windows...

...6.1.1 0010 20323031 36303632 31202852 65642048 20160621 (Red H 0020 61742036 2e312e31 2d332900 636c616e at 6.1.1-3).clan 0030 67207665 7273696f 6e20342e 302e3020 g version 4.0.0 0040 28747275 6e6b2032 38353332 36292028 (trunk 285326) ( 0050 6c6c766d 2f747275 6e6b2032 38353331 llvm/trunk 28531 0060 38290063 6c616e67 20766572 73696f6e 8).clang version 0070 20342e30 2e302028 7472756e 6b203238 4.0.0 (trunk 28 0080 34323239 2920286c 6c766d2f 7472756e 4229) (llvm/trun 0090 6b203238 34323438 2900636c 616e6720 k 284248).clang 00a0 76657273 696f6e20 342e302e 30202874 version 4.0.0 (t...

...128 > readint(p1c.gzip, 64,2) [1] -25620 -17287 21838 -16137 -8489 3835 13806 -28067 -30452 -24244 [11] 11464 18547 5320 -24287 -13180 -14761 13486 -2902 18582 8798 [21] 29513 21369 -27830 10578 29509 -13015 -23255 -13784 25643 11960 [31] -4233 -8515 -2123 -6311 -4455 28531 -1163 -2077 -775 -25282 [41] -6161 -2242 -12679 -2128 27610 -16977 24278 -25369 61 11268 [51] 532 -27778 -21424 -17619 -29359 -19503 -10426 22632 28771 -20751 [61] -23825 -25437 -24301 -4469 > Is it impossilble to use Rsteams function with the connection functions from the...

...> > ret <4 x i32> %shuf > } > > > For the goal of canonicalization in IR, which of these should we prefer? > Some backend / lowering differences for AArch64 and PPC are noted in: > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28530 > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28531 > > x86 converts either form optimally in all cases I've looked at. > > This question first came up in D22114 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D22114 ) > and is extended in D23886 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D23886 ) with a > constant value example. > > > > ______________...

...23031 36303632 31202852 65642048 20160621 (Red H > 0020 61742036 2e312e31 2d332900 636c616e at 6.1.1-3).clan > 0030 67207665 7273696f 6e20342e 302e3020 g version 4.0.0 > 0040 28747275 6e6b2032 38353332 36292028 (trunk 285326) ( > 0050 6c6c766d 2f747275 6e6b2032 38353331 llvm/trunk 28531 > 0060 38290063 6c616e67 20766572 73696f6e 8).clang version > 0070 20342e30 2e302028 7472756e 6b203238 4.0.0 (trunk 28 > 0080 34323239 2920286c 6c766d2f 7472756e 4229) (llvm/trun > 0090 6b203238 34323438 2900636c 616e6720 k 284248).clang > 00a0 76657273 696f6e20 342e302e 3020287...

Hi, As a next question to my building this server. I'm nogt able to get a full verbose dmesg. Probably because the kernelbuffer for it is too small. I know there used to be a kernel option to increase it. But I can not find it with the setting in NOTES or any other place I looked.... Is it still there? Thanx, --WjW

Hello, We’d like to keep track of which clang version was used to build our LLVM binaries. We use cmake and ninja with clang to build. What do you people think would be the cleanest way to know which version of clang is used, on a user’s machine, to build those binaries. I’m hoping to script this. I was thinking that getting cmake/ninja to spit out this information, if possible, would probably be

...> > ret <4 x i32> %shuf > } > > > For the goal of canonicalization in IR, which of these should we prefer? > Some backend / lowering differences for AArch64 and PPC are noted in: > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28530 > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28531 > > x86 converts either form optimally in all cases I've looked at. > > > This question first came up in D22114 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D22114 ) > and is extended in D23886 ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D23886 ) with a > constant value example. > > > > _________...

Le Anh Quang wrote: > Hi, > but on some other project, they require "configure.lib". What is this one ? > Thanks Hi Le Anh, What project are you talking about, and how did you determine that it requires "configure.lib" ? AFAIK, all LLVM projects have dependency on the configure project but this is only so that some include files are created, no

...____________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llvm-dis_properties.PNG Type: application/octet-stream Size: 28531 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080701/f9efa68c/attachment.obj>

Hi, but on some other project, they require "configure.lib". What is this one ? Thanks -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] Im Auftrag von Jean-Daniel Dupas Gesendet: Dienstag, 1. Juli 2008 17:58 An: LLVM Developers Mailing List Betreff: Re: [LLVMdev] build on windows AFAK, the Configuration project does not

...bedCtxt @FirewallAPI.dll,-28502|" HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\ControlSet001\services\SharedAccess\Defaults\FirewallPolicy\FirewallRules "FPS-NB_Datagram-Out-UDP-NoScope"="v2.10|Action=Allow|Active=FALSE|Dir=Out|Protocol=17|Profile=Domain|RPort=138|App=System|Name=@FirewallAPI.dll,-28531|Desc=@FirewallAPI.dll,-28534|EmbedCtxt @FirewallAPI.dll,-28502|" HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\ControlSet001\services\SharedAccess\Defaults\FirewallPolicy\FirewallRules "FPS-SpoolSvc-In-TCP-NoScope"="v2.10|Action=Allow|Active=FALSE|Dir=In|Protocol=6|Profile=Domain|LPort=RPC|App=%Sys...