search for: 2828bf59

...eadable structure is the first: minsizeopt sizeopt quickopt opt maxopt I'd like to hear some support for one or the other of these before deciding. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130114/2828bf59/attachment.html>

If I understand the attributes correctly, they would be function-level attributes applied to IR functions, correct? I'm curious what the semantics would be for cross-function optimization. For example, consider a function "foo" defined with maxopt and a function "bar" defined with optsize. If foo() calls bar() and the inliner wants to inline bar() into foo(), is that

This has been an idea floating around in my head for a while and after several discussions with others it continues to hold up so I thought I would mail it out. Sorry for cross posting to both lists, but this is an issue that would significantly impact both LLVM and Clang. Essentially, LLVM provides canned optimization "levels" for frontends to re-use. This is nothing new. However, we