search for: 280m

...y acceptable. The way offlineimap reads may is by FETCHing metadata, then APPENDing new local mail, SEARCHing for the UIDs of each uploaded mail, and finally FETCHing new remote mail. Memory use seems to be O(n) in the size of the folder. On the folder with 70k messages, dovecot seems to allocate 280m of memory, which it then fills to about 70% during the metadata FETCH, and then keeps growing while APPEND/SEARCHing the new local messages. The 70k mailbox is just short of 600Mb in size on disk. Dovecot uses 280Mb to serve it. Is it possible that dovecot is reading too much into memory, or over-...

...and this can reduce binary/profile data size significantly. Function name's MD5 hash is a good candidate, and I have a patch (3 parts: runtime, reader/writer, clang) that does just that. The results are very promising. With this change, the clang instrumented binary size is now 216M (down from 280M); the raw profile size is only 40.1M (a 2.85X size reduction); and the indexed profile size is only 29.5M (a 2.2X size reduction). With the change, the indexed format size is smaller than GCC's (but the latter has value profile data). The binary size is still much larger than GCC's, but w...

Hi everyone! I''m planning to migrate a little firm''s Windows server to a HVM machine. The test setup woks fine (it''s basically an MSSQL server tied pack of programs for an accountancy office), all programs can reach the mssql from the outside on the hvm windows. If fact it turned out to be so good, that I''m even planning to simply copy the win image(s) to the

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a