search for: 280kbit

...If it send traffic through the VLAN (I have a Linux PC in the othere end), I will only get a performance of about 312Kbit/s. Not 1024Kbit as I would expect. If I use: tc filter add dev eth1.1024 parent 4:0 protocol ip prio 0x1 handle 0x100 u32 match ip src 10.0.0.0/24 classid 4:800 I get only 280Kbit/s through. If I create the setup on eth0 instead on the VLAN it works very well. Does anybody have a clue? I have read that Martin Devera recommends to use iptables on VLANs, but as you see it does not make a difference... Btw.: When I test I connect a PC to eth0 and one to eth1 with VLAN. An...

...10 tc -s class show dev eth1 class htb 1:1 root rate 520Kbit ceil 520Kbit burst 2264b cburst 2264b Sent 174465 bytes 1142 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 712bps 5pps lended: 4 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 34107 ctokens: 34107 class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: prio 3 rate 160Kbit ceil 280Kbit burst 1803b cburst 1957b Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 90199 ctokens: 55942 class htb 1:20 parent 1:1 leaf 20: prio 0 rate 40Kbit ceil 80Kbit burst 1650b cburst 1701b Sent 115721 bytes 990 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) rate 340bps 3pps...

OK, here it is. Near perfect bandwidth calculation for ADSL users. Patch iproute2 with the HTB stuff and then this: It''s still a hack (as far as I can tell) because we are patching the rates tables, and hence I think it is only loosly coupled with the actual calculation of bytes in each bucket. However, it works very nicely for me! I have only been lightly testing with

After doing an informal (128k) listening test, I have concluded that I prefer Beta4 over RC2. The 16kHz low-pass on the RC2 encoder makes it sound like FM radio. Both encoders SEEM to have a couple of dB bump at 10kHz. JT --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to