Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "28028".
Did you mean:
2028
2001 Nov 29
3
smbmounts hang around after windows client disconnects
Using 2.2.1a and a 2.4 kernel patched for win4lin.
Everything is working but:
I mount all the available network shares on my linux box as root to one
network directory.
If a windows client shuts down while the linux box is still connected, the
share is not removed from my mount list or from /proc/mounts
It cannot be removed with umount. I can kill the smbmount with kill -15 but
the share is still
2006 Feb 05
2
I appear to be attacking others
It looks like my CentOS 4.2 box is attacking other people with some type
of ftp attack. I got an email from somebody saying they were being
attacked by my IP address.
Further investigation /var/log/messages shows a whole bunch of sshd
attacks on me, none of which appear successful. I'm running ethereal
right now and I can see that my system is doing some kind of ftp attacks
on others.
2010 Aug 31
2
[Bug 1812] New: ControlPersist causes defunct/zombie processes
....org
ReportedBy: cjwatson at debian.org
In the linked Debian bug, martin f krafft reported:
"Since switching on ControlPersist, I have dozens of defunct ssh
processes in the process table, e.g.:
madduck 28025 0.0 0.0 40612 2784 pts/8 S+ 09:17 0:00 ssh
pulse
madduck 28028 0.0 0.0 0 0 pts/8 Z+ 09:17 0:00
[ssh] <defunct>
madduck 28029 0.0 0.0 40704 1188 ? Ss 09:17 0:00 ssh
pulse
The PIDs suggest thatt hese are related. It looks to me that the
second process is the clone process, which, according to strace,
only does:
open(...
2002 Sep 10
4
ext3 performance mystery
...0 1160 348 716 99 1 0
1 1 1 11196 2304 28048 30128 0 0 0 1116 366 728 99 1 0
1 1 1 11196 2304 28080 30096 0 0 0 1116 345 691 96 4 0
1 1 1 11196 2304 28000 30176 0 0 0 1148 350 717 98 2 0
1 1 1 11196 2304 28028 30148 0 0 0 1132 342 707 98 2 0
0 1 1 11196 2356 27904 30272 0 0 0 1136 351 758 39 3 58
1 0 0 11196 2356 27904 30272 0 0 0 1152 356 758 1 3 96
2 0 0 11196 2336 27840 30304 0 0 0 820 287 585 34 2 64
2 0 0...
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...32 0 0.02 88432
Galign11.ll 5 85622 0 0.01 85607 0 0.01 85607
garage.ll 25 32013 0 0.01 31982 0 0.01 31982
gasp.ll 6 51262 0 0.01 51232 0 0.01 51232
gcc-loops.ll 99 215027 3 0.02 214260 3 0.03 214260
gdevmem.ll 27 181881 0 0.02 181857 0 0.03 179175
gdevs.ll 1 1879 0 0.01 1855 0 0.01 1855
gemm.ll 12 28028 0 0.01 27980 0 0.01 27980
gemver.ll 12 35733 0 0.01 35683 0 0.01 35683
genalign11.ll 3 69116 0 0.01 69101 0 0.02 69101
gen_c.ll 40 303014 2 0.03 297916 2 0.03 283690
gen_cpp.ll 21 186423 3 0.02 172496 3 0.02 172496
gen_cs.ll 13 137612 2 0.02 128367 2 0.02 128367
general.ll 1 2295 0 0.01 2266 0 0.01...