search for: 27ms

...6:37] NOTICE[26082] chan_sip.c: Peer 'client _201' is now Reachable. (26ms / 5000ms) [2010-11-13 17:58:12] NOTICE[26082] chan_sip.c: Peer 'client _201' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 28 [2010-11-13 17:58:22] NOTICE[26082] chan_sip.c: Peer 'client _201' is now Reachable. (27ms / 5000ms) [2010-11-13 17:59:58] NOTICE[26082] chan_sip.c: Peer 'client _201' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 27 [2010-11-13 18:00:08] NOTICE[26082] chan_sip.c: Peer 'client _201' is now Reachable. (27ms / 5000ms) [2010-11-13 18:01:43] NOTICE[26082] chan_sip.c: Peer 'client _2...

...ppeer' is now Reachable. (29ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:27] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (22ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:27] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (27ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:27] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (30ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:27] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (31ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:27] N...

...01/101 68.156.63.111 D N 1038 OK (133 ms) This seems pretty high when my ping time from a host on the same network is ~30ms: Pinging 209.251.157.93 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.251.157.93: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.251.157.93: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.251.157.93: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=51 Reply from 209.251.157.93: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=51 Any suggestions or is this normal? Should I enable qos on my Cisco 3725 router and 2950 switch? Would I also need to enable the following in the sip.conf ;tos_sip=cs3...

...27] pbx_ael.c: File /etc/asterisk/extensions.ael not found; AEL declining load [May 11 09:02:58] ERROR[17813] chan_zap.c: !! Got S-frame while link down *Realtime peers are reacheble again, why they got unreachable?* [May 11 09:02:59] NOTICE[17835] chan_sip.c: Peer '870' is now Reachable. (27ms / 2000ms) [May 11 09:03:00] NOTICE[17835] chan_sip.c: Peer '901' is now Reachable. (26ms / 2000ms) [May 11 09:03:00] NOTICE[17835] chan_sip.c: Peer '982' is now Reachable. (62ms / 2000ms) [May 11 09:03:07] NOTICE[17835] chan_sip.c: Peer '937' is now Reachable. (62ms / 2000ms...

...that WinXP or Win2000 is not requesting readahead far enough to be useful. My link roundtrip latency is around .4 ms beyond the data transmission time, the samba servicing time for 32K of data (32K is the blocksize I'm using) is about .27 ms, and the wire time for 32K of data should be around .27ms on GigE. I understand that it is necessary that oplocking be functional to have the windows client read ahead. However, I have verified that oplocks are being established, yet still the readahead seems either nonexistant or minimal. I don't know how to establish which. FreeBSD is the host O...

...min mean median max `itr/sec` mem_alloc n_gc n_itr <chr> <bch:t> <bch:t> <bch:t> <bch> <dbl> <bch:byt> <dbl> <int> 1 orig 8.15ms 8.67ms 8.43ms 10ms 115. 3.82MB 4 52 2 new 25.21ms 25.58ms 25.45ms 27ms 39.1 3.82MB 2 18 # ... with 5 more variables: total_time <bch:tm>, result <list>, memory <list>, # time <list>, gc <list> When sampling from fewer values, the difference is much less pronounced: > bench::mark(orig = sample.int(6, 1000000, replace...

Hi, i upgrade to sles sp1 with sernet packages and get the following error after upgrade. Its looks like that port 135 will not reached. Anyone who have an information about that or a solution? Thanks Sven orion:~ # samba-tool drs showrepl Failed to connect host 192.168.24.2 on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Failed to connect host 192.168.24.2 (orion.domain.local) on port 135 -

On 9/20/18 1:43 AM, Carl Boettiger wrote: > For a well-tested C algorithm, based on my reading of Lemire, the unbiased > "algorithm 3" in https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.10941 is part already of the C > standard library in OpenBSD and macOS (as arc4random_uniform), and in the > GNU standard library. Lemire also provides C++ code in the appendix of his > piece for both this and