Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "27e".
Did you mean:
27
2015 Nov 21
2
Recent -Os code size regressions
...586.
Unfortunately the object files are wildly different in a way that does not
seem to occur in other workloads. I tried to clip a concise before and
after case.
Before
:
As a reference point, I found OR $0x408 and OR $0x810 in close proximity.
278: 81 ca 10 08 00 00 or $0x810,%edx
27e: 89 10 mov %edx,(%eax)
280: f6 c1 40
test $0x40,%cl
283: 74 08 je 28d <t_run_test+0x28d>
285: 81 ca 08 04 00 00 or $0x408,%edx
28b: 89 10 mov %edx,(%eax)
28d: 84 c9 test %cl,%cl
28f: 0...
2013 Mar 14
2
Grep with wildcards across multiple columns
...arge data set with six variables set up like the following dummy:
# Create fake data
df <- data.frame(code = c(rep(1001, 8), rep(1002, 8)),
year = rep(c(rep(2011, 4), rep(2012, 4)), 2),
fund = rep(c("10E", "10E", "10E", "27E"), 4),
func = rep(c("110000", "122000", "214000", "158000"), 4),
obj = rep("100", 16),
amount = round(rnorm(16, 50000, 10000)))
What I would like to do is sum the amount variable by code...
2005 Oct 27
3
Strange behaviour of type conversion (PR#8256)
Where is my error??
I have a strange behaviour in R, looks like type conversions are messed =
up.
Maybe i just make a stupid mistake, but help would be appreciated.
To reproduce:
expected:
> typeof(3)
[1] "double"
> as.integer(3)
[1] 3
> typeof((0.3/0.1))
[1] "double"
!!!! strange:
> as.integer((0.3/0.1))
[1] 2
also for trunc:
>trunc(c(5,7))
[1] 5 7
2015 Nov 21
3
Recent -Os code size regressions
Maybe adjust this to be different for –Os, -Oz than for –O2?
Kevin Smith
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of James Molloy via llvm-dev
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 4:05 PM
To: Steve King <steve at metrokings.com>; Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Recent -Os code