Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "279c6666".
2013 Sep 10
2
[LLVMdev] Intel Memory Protection Extensions (and types question)
...> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130910/279c6666/attachment.html>
2013 Sep 10
0
[LLVMdev] Intel Memory Protection Extensions (and types question)
Hi Kevin,
We're also interested in support for fat pointers in LLVM/clang and it would be nice to have some general infrastructure for them (we currently have a load of hacks). There are a lot of research architectures with fat pointers, and MPX is likely to be just the first of many to start hitting real silicon soon. There are a few properties that we'd ideally want to represent in
2013 Sep 09
4
[LLVMdev] Intel Memory Protection Extensions (and types question)
Hi all,
I'm currently adding new instructions and registers to the X86 code
generator for Intel Memory Protection Extensions [1].
A class of special-purpose registers BNDx each holds 2 x 64-bit values.
The components are not individually readable or writable (except by
going through memory) but there are instructions that read only one
of the two elements. The two 64-bit values can be