Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "279600".
Did you mean:
27600
2011 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] [MC] Removing relaxation control
On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola wrote:
>>> Can someone else try to reproduce this?
>
> I tried gcc.c from
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/smcc/projects/single-file-programs/ and the
> difference is a bit more noticeable:
>
> -O0 -mno-relax-all
>
> real 0m13.182s
> user 0m12.690s
> sys 0m0.450s
>
> -O0
>
> gcc.o is
2011 Feb 25
3
[LLVMdev] [MC] Removing relaxation control
>> Can someone else try to reproduce this?
I tried gcc.c from
http://people.csail.mit.edu/smcc/projects/single-file-programs/ and the
difference is a bit more noticeable:
-O0 -mno-relax-all
real 0m13.182s
user 0m12.690s
sys 0m0.450s
-O0
gcc.o is 10932968 bytes.
real 0m12.969s
user 0m12.520s
sys 0m0.410s
gcc.o is 11410552 bytes
IMHO it would still be reasonable to switch to