Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "278e17be".
2016 Mar 11
7
Any objections to re-sorting #include lines with clang-format/clang-tidy?
The crazy clang-format folks have taught it to sort includes, and
clang-tidy has a nice way to run it across all of LLVM and Clang.
Before I just submit the fixes (and any bug reports to the clang-format
folks if it sorts things weirdly) I wanted to double check that folks would
be ok with this. My understanding is that the sorting should match the LLVM
conventions, but if not, I'll make sure