search for: 275000

...I am having problems inverting matrices using the function solve() For example R can not invert the following matrix [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [1,] 25 500 11250 275000 7.106250e+06 [2,] 500 11250 275000 7106250 1.906250e+08 [3,] 11250 275000 7106250 190625000 5.247656e+09 [4,] 275000 7106250 190625000 5247656250 1.471719e+11 [5,] 7106250 190625000 5247656250 147171...

...ys I would be most grateful for help. I've tried various permutations of likely-looking code but get error messages every time. I could find no example in the documentation. Many thanks, Dan Bebber Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3RB UK Tel. 01865 275000

...arguments briefly on p.90. I would like to know whether these results indicate that the significant effect found in summary(mconc.lme) is spurious (perhaps due to multiplicity). Many thanks, Dan Bebber Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3RB UK Tel. 01865 275000

...age 'file7460' missing or broken in: packageDescription(i, fields = "Title", lib.loc = lib) I am running R 2.0 on Windows XP. Any ideas what caused this? Many thanks, Dan Bebber Department of Plant Sciences University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3RB UK Tel. 01865 275000

...gt; scimark2). Other than that, everything seems to run just fine. We have > about 7410 unique fallbacks out of 52367 unique functions. Assuming I > counted right (please let me know if this looks fishy, I personally > find the total number of functions terrifyingly small). It's about 275000 before uniqueing (which roughly matches an earlier measurement I did). The duplication seems to be dominated by the halide tests, though you have to be a little careful with "main" (which occurs about 500 times). At a glance I'd put the total closer to 53000 (52420 + 492 extra copies...

I have a data set in which I have 5000 repeated measures on 6 subjects over time (varying intervals, but measurements for all individuals are at the same times). There are two states, a "resting" state (the majority of the time), and a perturbed state. I have a continuous measurement at each time point for each of the individuals. I would like to determine the "state"

I've kicked off a run to compare "-O0 -g" versus "-O0 -g -mllvm -global-isel -mllvm -global-isel-abort=2". I've selected the test-suite (albeit a version which is a couple of months old now) and a few short-running proprietary benchmarks to get data back quickly for an initial feel of where things are. This was running on Cortex-A57 AArch64 Linux. I saw one assertion