search for: 271274

I hope I've fixed this properly just now in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... On 30 May 2016, at 21:01, Arnaud De Grandmaison <Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com<mailto:Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com>> wrote: I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix. I've been a...

I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix. I've been able to hack it locally exploiting the very same lit limitation then the one we're stumbling on (i.e it does not resolve dependency correctly and only pick-up the first constraint). You need to make sure the Flask constraint is seen first, even before using the requirements.txt so on the

On 31 May 2016 at 14:34, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> wrote: > I hope I've fixed this properly just now in > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. > Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... Do the bots need restarting for that to take effect? --renato

...th .11. It is a dot release, the changes are minor. Sent from my iPhone > On May 31, 2016, at 6:34 AM, Kristof Beyls via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I hope I've fixed this properly just now in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. > Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... > >> On 30 May 2016, at 21:01, Arnaud De Grandmaison <Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com> wrote: >> >> I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix. >> >> I'...

...On 31 May 2016, at 16:01, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > > On 31 May 2016 at 14:34, Kristof Beyls <Kristof.Beyls at arm.com> wrote: >> I hope I've fixed this properly just now in >> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. >> Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... > > Do the bots need restarting for that to take effect? > > --renato >

I'm running into problems with set.seed--maybe I'm misunderstanding something. I'm running R 1.5.1 on Windows 2000. I'm basically trying to capture the random seed so that I can reproduce a simulation if it's necessary later. Using set.seed, I can certainly get reproducible results, but not the results I get on the first pass. Here's an example: # Generate a random

...se, the changes are minor. Sent from my iPhone On May 31, 2016, at 6:34 AM, Kristof Beyls via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: I hope I've fixed this properly just now in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... On 30 May 2016, at 21:01, Arnaud De Grandmaison <Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com<mailto:Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com>> wrote: I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix. I've been a...