search for: 270mb

Hi all, I'm seeing slow transfers to/from my samba server. I just tried to copy a 270MB file from a samba share to an XP machine. At first, the estimated time displayed as 141 minutes :( The odd thing is that if I then flood-ping from the server (in this case, I pinged my dsl router), the transfer completes in about 10 seconds. Hitting F5 repeatedly when browsing a share on the se...

Is there any way to find out what causes a 80mb executable with lld/link? The object files are compiled with -function-sections and -data-sections, the originating .lib is 270mb, but I'm calling 1 function in it, which might call some stuff recursively, but I don't know how to find out what exactly triggers the use. Is there a commandline option that shows this? (repro is 286 mb) : http://gofile.me/4Gflq/OOr8WKU12

Le 09/09/2017 ? 14:41, Phil Perry a ?crit : > Why were you surprised? Linux systems use the available RAM, surely you > understand that? I'm surprised because my system used the available RAM and then it even began to swap. > > Of course there is the possibility that you have discovered a bug Minimal CentOS 7 installation with BIND, Apache, MySQL, Postfix and Dovecot, regularly

...a few days will have > some pages that were used once when some long-running process started > and were never referenced again. Those pages will eventually migrate out > to swap, and that's the best place for them. Right now, I see that this > system has been up for 16 days and has ~270MB of swap used. I typically > see ~500MB of swap used when the system has been running a while longer. So, in other words, there's no need to worry if a little swap is used when the system's been running non-stop for a couple months? Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durable...

...Jun 7, 2019 at 8:59 PM Carlo Kok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Is there any way to find out what causes a 80mb executable with lld/link? >> >> >> The object files are compiled with -function-sections and -data-sections, the originating .lib is 270mb, but I'm calling 1 function in it, which might call some stuff recursively, but I don't know how to find out what exactly triggers the use. Is there a commandline option that shows this? >> >> (repro is 286 mb) : http://gofile.me/4Gflq/OOr8WKU12 >> _____________________...

...ok via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> Is there any way to find out what causes a 80mb executable with lld/link? >>>> >>>> >>>> The object files are compiled with -function-sections and -data-sections, the originating .lib is 270mb, but I'm calling 1 function in it, which might call some stuff recursively, but I don't know how to find out what exactly triggers the use. Is there a commandline option that shows this? >>>> >>>> (repro is 286 mb) : http://gofile.me/4Gflq/OOr8WKU12 >>>>...

...ixed it): https://github.com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c78ab58cb216 which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely reason is that the display_info.bpc == 0 for some reason (and we, rather questionably, default to 10bpc for bandwidth determination). There's no concrete theory as to what that reason might be, but it would explain what'...

.../024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c78a > > b5 8cb216 > > > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > > reason is that the display_info.bpc == 0 for some reason (and we, > > rather questionably, default to 10bpc for bandwidth determination). > > There's no concrete theory as to what that reason...

I recently got a new SSD (ocz vertex LE 50gb) It seems to work really well as a ZIL performance wise. My question is, how safe is it? I know it doesn''t have a supercap so lets'' say dataloss occurs....is it just dataloss or is it pool loss? also, does the fact that i have a UPS matter? the numbers i''m seeing are really nice....these are some nfs tar times before

...ously for more that a few days will have some pages that were used once when some long-running process started and were never referenced again. Those pages will eventually migrate out to swap, and that's the best place for them. Right now, I see that this system has been up for 16 days and has ~270MB of swap used. I typically see ~500MB of swap used when the system has been running a while longer. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.

...have >> some pages that were used once when some long-running process started >> and were never referenced again. Those pages will eventually migrate out >> to swap, and that's the best place for them. Right now, I see that this >> system has been up for 16 days and has ~270MB of swap used. I typically >> see ~500MB of swap used when the system has been running a while longer. > > So, in other words, there's no need to worry if a little swap is used > when the system's been running non-stop for a couple months? It?s nothing unusual and a good thin...

...with the performance boost provided by the new nVidia SATA driver. I had noticed a drop in bonnie++ performance once the pool started to fill up, but with the new drive its is better than the original fresh performance. With a stripe of 4 2 way mirrors (Seagate320GB 16M drives) block write is now 270MB/s (up from 228) and block read 428MB/s (up from 296). Ian

...time (1/2 hour ) the consumption of RAM >decreased somewhat. When I use the workspace browser on the GUI and >I use "refresh" the consumption of RAM fluctuate each time both >decreasing and incresing even if the workspace do not change. For >example I can pass from using 270mb of memory to 430mb (or the >contrary) simply pushing several time refresh. The value is stable >once I do not push refresh anymore >thanks >saverio [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...n asked and answered many times. Andy > From: Kenneth Cabrera > > Hi R users: > > I am using R 2.01. over a LINUX(Scientific Linux CERN) > platform and I got the following problem: > It takes too much time (more than 6 hours, because I > stop the process) to read a > 270MB database. I am using read.table() function. > > Is there any workaround to read faster a big data base? > > Thank you for your help. > > Kenneth > >

...06.00.009) with the driver is buggy if you use more than 1 unit. (Hotspares are considered as an unit.). We got a new firmware from 3ware support and it solves the problem. With some tweaking and 5 x RAID 5 volume on 3 x 3ware card (capacity around 5TB) we got with the iozone test 160MB/s write and 270MB/s Read. If you want more detailed information contact me.

...<46C242A4.90508 at zytor.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Duke McAllister wrote: > > > > I'd *love* to exc the std ISO is 700MB ! Pairing it down to just > > the BartPE code makes it about 450MB, maybe I could get it down > > to 270MB w/ tight 7Z-LZMA compression. If you don't mind d/l'g > > something *that* big, let me know and I'll > > try and make a pkg for you to d/l.... > > > > I don't have a problem downloading a big image... > > -hpa > Very good. Send me a private e...

Hi. I have a problem with Ms Access *.MDB files. When I tried to edit forms it takes at least 60 seconds to edit that forms also to edit query. Application is working fine. But editing ... horrible. I added these lines in my smb.conf file but nothing oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no strict locking = no fake oplocks = no veto oplock files =

...> b5 8cb216 > > > > > > > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > > > > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > > > > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > > > > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > > > > reason is that the display_info.bpc == 0 for some reason (and we, > > > > rather questionably, default to 10bpc for bandwidth determination). > > > > There's no...

...> 8a > > > b5 8cb216 > > > > > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > > > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > > > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > > > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > > > reason is that the display_info.bpc == 0 for some reason (and we, > > > rather questionably, default to 10bpc for bandwidth determination). > > > There's no concrete theory as...

...com/skeggsb/nouveau/commit/024bda7d2b0c3b0731433d60a494c78ab5 > 8cb216 > > which is what causes us to even try 540MB/s link training. However > with this fix applied, it'll just give up faster. I'm told eDP is > generally a single lane, and you're trying to get more than 270MB/s. > So ... the question is ... why is it trying to do 10bpc. One likely > reason is that the display_info.bpc == 0 for some reason (and we, > rather questionably, default to 10bpc for bandwidth determination). > There's no concrete theory as to what that reason might be, but it &gt...