search for: 270gb

...We have two servers with BIND9 DNS and all are working just fine. Today, when we attempted to move couple of users from one OU to another, Windows RSAT reported /*"Windows cannot move object. Ther*//*e *//*is not enough storage space*//*"*/. Our servers have 300 GB Storage more that 270GB is free on the storage. At the moment we have added about 1000 users and about 450 computers into domain. Overall, we will add about 7500 users and equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed that RSAT lost the connection to domain all of a sudden. However, when I restarted the samba-ad-dc...

...s >> not enough storage space*//*"*/. > I wouldn't take the error string literally. There are too many layers > of mapping going on. LDAP does not contain such an error, so think of > it as a bad translation. > >> Our servers have 300 GB Storage more >> that 270GB is free on the storage. At the moment we have added about >> 1000 users and about 450 computers into domain. Overall, we will add >> about 7500 users and equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed >> that RSAT lost the connection to domain all of a sudden. However, >> w...

...ject. Ther*//*e > *//*is  > not enough storage space*//*"*/. I wouldn't take the error string literally. There are too many layers of mapping going on. LDAP does not contain such an error, so think of it as a bad translation. > Our servers have 300 GB Storage more  > that 270GB is free on the storage. At the moment we have added about  > 1000 users and about 450 computers into domain. Overall, we will add  > about 7500 users and equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed  > that RSAT lost the connection to domain all of a sudden. However, > when I  > r...

...08.2017 um 17:39 schrieb Anantha Raghava via samba: > Today, when we attempted to move couple of users from one OU to another, > Windows RSAT reported /*"Windows cannot move object. Ther*//*e *//*is > not enough storage space*//*"*/. Our servers have 300 GB Storage more > that 270GB is free on the storage. At the moment we have added about > 1000 users and about 450 computers into domain. Overall, we will add > about 7500 users and equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed > that RSAT lost the connection to domain all of a sudden. However, when I > restarted...

...e for PGO vs PGO+LTO) > - GCC 5.1/5.2/5.3 can't build Clang with LTO enabled > (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66027), that's supposed to be > fixed in GCC 5.4 > > Clang: > - PGO works and gives a good 1.12x speedup over the -O3 build (produced > about 270GB of profiling data when I tried this in December last year, this > should be addressed soon once the in-process profiling data merging lands) > - LTO provides a 1.03x speedup over the -O3 build > - I have not tried LTO+PGO with full Clang bootstrap profiling data but I > would expect...

...gt; I wouldn't take the error string literally.  There are too many > > layers > > of mapping going on.  LDAP does not contain such an error, so think > > of > > it as a bad translation.  > > > > > Our servers have 300 GB Storage more  > > > that 270GB is free on the storage. At the moment we have added > > > about  > > > 1000 users and about 450 computers into domain. Overall, we will > > > add  > > > about 7500 users and equal no of computers to domain. I also > > > noticed  > > > that RSAT...

...t; I wouldn't take the error string literally. There are too many > >>> layers of mapping going on. LDAP does not contain such > an error, so > >>> think of it as a bad translation. > >>> > >>>> Our servers have 300 GB Storage more that 270GB is free on the > >>>> storage. At the moment we have added about 1000 users > and about 450 > >>>> computers into domain. Overall, we will add about 7500 users and > >>>> equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed that > RSAT lost the &g...

I had only a quick view on the blog-texts. It might be that a CLANG generated with LTO/PGO speeds up the build. Can you confirm this? Can you confirm binutils-gold speed up the build? Has LLVM an own linker? Can be used? Speedup the build? Yesterday night I loooked through available CMAKE/LLVM variables... ### GOLD # CMAKE_LINKER:FILEPATH=/usr/bin/ld #

...39;t take the error string literally. There are too many >>>>> layers of mapping going on. LDAP does not contain such >> an error, so >>>>> think of it as a bad translation. >>>>> >>>>>> Our servers have 300 GB Storage more that 270GB is free on the >>>>>> storage. At the moment we have added about 1000 users >> and about 450 >>>>>> computers into domain. Overall, we will add about 7500 users and >>>>>> equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed that >> RSAT...

...ndows cannot move object. Ther*//*e *//*is not enough storage space*//*"*/. I wouldn't take the error string literally. There are too many layers of mapping going on. LDAP does not contain such an error, so think of it as a bad translation. Our servers have 300 GB Storage more that 270GB is free on the storage. At the moment we have added about 1000 users and about 450 computers into domain. Overall, we will add about 7500 users and equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed that RSAT lost the connection to domain all of a sudden. However, when I restarted the samb...

...string literally. There are too many >>>>>> layers of mapping going on. LDAP does not contain such >>> an error, so >>>>>> think of it as a bad translation. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Our servers have 300 GB Storage more that 270GB is free on the >>>>>>> storage. At the moment we have added about 1000 users >>> and about 450 >>>>>>> computers into domain. Overall, we will add about 7500 users and >>>>>>> equal no of computers to domain. I also noticed tha...