Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "26dbccf2".
2014 Feb 06
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
...bles and add/remove the ELF sections from the
objects? If that's so, I can easily remove -arm-disable-ehabi and check on
that flag.
thanks,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140206/26dbccf2/attachment.html>
2014 Feb 06
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Unwind behaviour in Clang/LLVM
On 6 February 2014 13:59, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de>wrote:
> This is not true. Even for nounwind, you want to get basic tables so
> that backtrace(3) works.
>
Hi Joerg,
It's a matter of consensus, I believe. Is it the general consensus that we
will *always* want unwind tables to exist? Code size is a clear reason to
not want unwind tables at all, but