Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "268865".
Did you mean:
368865
2002 Feb 15
1
cmdscale k=1
In applying multidimensional scaling, it seems to me that sometimes the
underlying dimensionality of the matrix is 1. However I found a case
where cmdscale failed when I tried k=1. Here it is:
m<-matrix(
c(.5,.81,.23,.47,.61,
.19,.5,.06,.17,.28,
.77,.94,.5,.74,.85,
.53,.83,.26,.5,.64,
.39,.72,.15,.36,.5),
nrow=5)
# BTW I think cmdscale uses only the lower triangle--how to enter only
# that
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...39 0 0.02 163539
md_high.ll 1 124678 0 0.02 124657 0 0.02 124657
md_highloss.ll 1 128198 0 0.02 128177 0 0.02 128177
md_low.ll 1 156206 0 0.02 156185 0 0.02 156185
me_distortion.ll 21 382990 0 0.04 382969 0 0.04 380522
me_epzs.ll 26 932551 0 0.08 932530 0 0.09 932530
me_fullfast.ll 10 268886 0 0.03 268865 0 0.03 268865
me_fullsearch.ll 5 205532 0 0.02 205511 0 0.02 205511
memalloc.ll 47 144392 0 0.02 144371 * * *
member-function-pointers.ll 6 7652 0 0.01 7641 0 0.01 7641
MemBlocks.ll 16 46800 0 0.01 46768 0 0.01 46768
memory.ll 12 44937 0 0.01 44907 0 0.01 44907
methcall.ll 9 15754 0 0.01 15735 0 0....