search for: 25ms

...we use exclusively Digium B410p cards that provide 64ms tail EC. For several reasons we'd like to switch to external BRI gateways like the Patton smartnodes (the price is getting really close to a B410p). I'm however curious about their HW EC. I see in the datasheets that it only has 25ms tail per channel (pri are 128ms, but not BRI). Are some of you using these gateway and do your experience (many) echo problems on calls ? Our other alternative is to use sangoma cards that have 128ms HW EC and seem more stable overall, but it is yet a bit more expensive. Thanks for your feed...

Hello, I am trying to get the TC command to work on our debian box to limit traffic in and out to 12 Meg. The command I am using is: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root tbf rate 12000kbit latency 25ms burst 1600 tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 12000kbit latency 25ms burst 1600 The problem I am having is that the bandwidth exceeds the 12 Meg by almost 5 Meg. Any help is appreciated. Thanks Mike Pearson

Hello, I have found that the use of sort_by_value very slow. 16800 result, return to the previous 10, sorting takes about 25ms. And if you do not sort, returns 10, need only about 0.3ms. How to make the sort faster? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.xapian.org/pipermail/xapian-devel/attachments/20140326/790430b0/attachment-0002.html>

hi all, long time since i posted on the list. just wondering if anybody has played around with hfsc and if so could he/she share their info on it thanks adrian -- To mess up a Linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up your Windows box, you just need to work on it. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

...s a local mp3 file) did read enough byte[] from the file (buffer=20KB) and send them to his bus, he waits the difference in time he has until 1 sec is full. Thus effectivly sending 20 KByte/s. So far this results in the producer to sleep for ~975 ms (transportaion of byte[] through bus taking ~25ms), thus I have an Idle thread running around. The ~25ms per producer would allow me to serve 40 producers (1000ms/25ms) with one server. This number seemed to be far too low, so I thought about a way to increase idle time for the producers. I came up with this idea and would like to know what yo...

...ppeer' is now Reachable. (30ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (24ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (25ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (29ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] NOTICE[20278]: chan_sip.c:12985 handle_response_peerpoke: Peer 'mysippeer' is now Reachable. (21ms / 2000ms) [Mar 12 10:17:26] N...

...s the relevant scipt commands I have dsl 1.5down and 256up. + tc qdisc del dev vlan1 root + tc qdisc add dev vlan1 root handle 1: hfsc default 30 + tc class add dev vlan1 parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 225kbit ul rate 225kbit + tc class add dev vlan1 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 hfsc rt m1 191kbit d 25ms m2 135kbit ls rate 135kbit ul rate 225kbit + tc class add dev vlan1 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 hfsc rt m1 22kbit d 25ms m2 56kbit ls rate 56kbit ul rate 225kbit + tc class add dev vlan1 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 hfsc rt m1 11kbit d 25ms m2 22kbit ls rate 22kbit ul rate 225kbit + tc class add dev vlan1 p...

...b68.shtml It will tell you just about everything you wanted to know about echo and more :) The short answer to your question, however, is that echo is comprised of two components: volume and delay. Increase either one and the problem gets worse. In the PSTN, the delay tends to be rather short (25ms or less) for most calls, and therefore, tends not to be noticed by the average listener. In a VoIP call, on the other hand, you must first translate the audio signal into digital, with a subsequent delay, pass the digital data through various routers, each of which add additional delay, then...

...P to an asterisk box in a datacentre using g729. The asterisk box in the datacentre connects to our other asterisk boxes providing pstn connectivity via IAX2. Latency between these boxes is between 1 and 2ms. The ADSL connections to the client sites are all consistently delivering latencies of sub-25ms to the datacentre and there is traffic shaping on that connection to give priority to any traffic from the phones' IPs. Comments from the users at these sites are as follows: "call sounded like a dalek and I couldn't make out anything the caller was saying" "the phone on my...

...we find that for some reason dovecot does not react to the capabily answer from nginx. while it seems to happily accept the same answer when it is coming from zimbra directly. - the only difference I can see on the wire is that nginx is much quicker (2.5ms) in responding than the zimbra (25ms) server and that the position of the STARTTLS and SASL=PLAIN capabilities in the capability answer differs between the two. any ideas ? cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland www.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902 *** We are hiring I...

...39;t affect other use cases. > We just want <1ms ping latency, but actually we are not sure what value is reasonable. > We have some test results using netperf before this patch as follow, > > Udp payload 1byte 100bytes 1000bytes 1400bytes > Ping avg latency 25ms 10ms 2ms 1.5ms > > What is other testcases? Something like https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10151645/. Btw, you need use time_before() to properly handle jiffies overflow and I would also suggest you to try something like #packets limit (e.g 64). For long term, we defi...

...39;t affect other use cases. > We just want <1ms ping latency, but actually we are not sure what value is reasonable. > We have some test results using netperf before this patch as follow, > > Udp payload 1byte 100bytes 1000bytes 1400bytes > Ping avg latency 25ms 10ms 2ms 1.5ms > > What is other testcases? Something like https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10151645/. Btw, you need use time_before() to properly handle jiffies overflow and I would also suggest you to try something like #packets limit (e.g 64). For long term, we defi...

Hello I purchased an AEX800 card to replace the ageing cheap channel bank/T1 card solution a few months ago, assuming that it would be a more robust solution for my small scale phone system. However, it appears to be anything but that. Originally implemented as a XEN dom-u virtual machine on a large server class machine, using PCI passthrough to pass the AEX800 and a small older TDM400, then

...ul if ntlm_auth returns 0. Since I had error messages in the logs pointing to requests timing out on ntlm_auth I wrote a short C wrapper around ntlm_auth to log the time it takes to return (as well as the username and domain). That showed that while most (~90%) authentications succeed in less than 25ms, about 10% take longer than 100ms with some taking as much as a few seconds (2-4s). So I increased winbind max domain connections on the (linux) server while also raising the MaxConcurrentApi on the DC. I now see 39 connections open to the DC from winbind (that number fluctuates). And yet the pro...

I need to setup incoming (over an 800 number and some local DID's) and outgoing phone calls (all over the country) with an Asterisk server. This asterisk server has 20 Polycom 430 phones connecting to it. I need the best possible SIP provider out there. I have tried http://www.nufone.net and http://www.broadvoice.com and they do not even come close to the expected quality. Does AT&T

...s. > > We just want <1ms ping latency, but actually we are not sure what value is reasonable. > > We have some test results using netperf before this patch as follow, > > > > Udp payload 1byte 100bytes 1000bytes 1400bytes > > Ping avg latency 25ms 10ms 2ms 1.5ms > > > > What is other testcases? > > Something like https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10151645/. > > Btw, you need use time_before() to properly handle jiffies overflow and I > would also suggest you to try something like #packets limi...

Can anyone help me with the uninitialized class variable @@env in OCI8 error raised in my app\views\xxxx index.html.erb file Thanks in advance Below is the code and the result of bundle show. I am using Windows 7 <h1>Listing comics</h1> <table> <tr> <th>Title</th> <th>Issue</th> <th>Publisher</th>

Adding Mohit who is experimenting with cgroups has found some way to restrict glustershd's CPU usage using cgroups. Mohit maybe you want to share the steps we need to follow to apply cgroups only to glustershd. Thanks. Ravi On 08/01/2017 03:46 PM, Alexey Zakurin wrote: > Hi, community > > I have a large distributed-replicated Glusterfs volume, that contains > few hundreds

...quot; " polarity - tests polarity reversal\n" " ring - rings phone\n"); exit(1); } // Code added by wj@xnk.nu to set the default tone length to shorten the time it takes to transmit DTMF CLIP // 25ms is enough for me but according to specs 40 _should_ be understood as a valid digit, YMMV. ctlfd = open("/dev/zap/ctl", O_RDWR); if (ctlfd == -1) { fprintf(stderr,"Couldn't open zapctl!\n"); } toneduration = 40; if (to...

...t;/occurring on the replicate/remote system. />//>/It might be time to describe our setups in order to possibly find co > mmon > grounds that might trigger this issue you describe and Rimko and myself > ran into as well. />//>/Servers: Cloud Instances (both identical), around 25ms latency apart. />/Intel Core Processor (Haswell, no TSX) (3092.91-MHz K8-class CPU) />/Both servers are connected via IPsec/racoon tunnels />/OS: FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE (both servers) />/Filesystem: ZFS />/MTA: postfix 3.4-20180401 (postfix delivers via dovecot's LMTP) />/IMAP: d...