search for: 259m

...$ uname -a Linux CentOS501.homegroannetwork 2.6.32-573.1.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat Jul 25 17:05:50 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.7 (Final) Top shows PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java . . . And several instances of Xorg (one per user in addition to the shown root instance), java, FF, soffice.bin, a plugin-container for FF, ... Using stock Gnome Desktop with three active X ses...

On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 23:51 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > Top shows > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java > > Well, what's process 23391, Looks like its java plugins to run trade screens application from ADVFN (Investorshub). But that's no different than what I was running b...

On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > Top shows > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java Well, what's process 23391, and does Xorg stop using a lot of CPU time if you terminate it?

...00, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 23:51 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 08/13/2015 02:44 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > > > Top shows > > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > > > 32160 root 20 0 259m 104m 22m R 76.5 1.3 559:07.79 Xorg > > > 23391 hardtolo 20 0 6293m 215m 26m S 16.9 2.7 21:49.86 java > > > > Well, what's process 23391, > <snip> > > and does Xorg stop using a lot of CPU time > > if you terminate it? > > <snip>...

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

...cit-1.0.dll -Wl,--out-implib,../../../lib/libSimpleITKExplicit-1.0.dll.a -Wl,--major-image-version,1,--minor-image-version,0 -Wl,--whole-archive CMakeFiles/SimpleITKExplicit.dir/objects.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive @CMakeFiles/SimpleITKExplicit.dir/linklibs.rsp As a guide, the final shared library is 259M on linux. The windows build doesn't appear to be memory limited - the ld process is using about 1.5G and consuming 1 core, but doesn't complete given an entire day. Any suggestions on where to turn next? Are cross compilers the next step? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 ------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST ------- Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are

...& I''ll see xenstored taking > 50% CPU, and XenD taking another 11% PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 2647 root 16 0 6188 840 464 R 52 0.0 0:55.04 xenstored 11600 root 18 0 259m 7568 1516 S 11 0.2 0:04.53 python Its not surprising that xend is consuming time since we are making many requests per second, but for an operation which is only doing reads it having so much time attributed to xenstored seems very excessive. So I ran oprofile &am...