search for: 2596a1c9f1bcdee91bb210c782141c88

...ost any change to the code will slightly change the behavior; sometimes the `ls()` returns values from a different iteration of the loop, and sometimes the problem doesn't happen at all. I've put a Dockerfile and instructions for reproducing the problem here: https://gist.github.com/wch/2596a1c9f1bcdee91bb210c782141c88 I think that I've gotten about as far with this as I can, though I'd be happy to provide more information if anyone wants to take look at the problem. -Winston [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...gt; the behavior; sometimes the `ls()` returns values from a different > > iteration of the loop, and sometimes the problem doesn't happen at all. > > > I've put a Dockerfile and instructions for reproducing the problem here: > > https://gist.github.com/wch/2596a1c9f1bcdee91bb210c782141c88 > > > I think that I've gotten about as far with this as I can, though I'd be > > happy to provide more information if anyone wants to take look at the > > problem. > > Dear Winston, > > While I agree this may very well be a bug in R(-devel), and...

...gt; the behavior; sometimes the `ls()` returns values from a different > > iteration of the loop, and sometimes the problem doesn't happen at all. > > > I've put a Dockerfile and instructions for reproducing the problem here: > > https://gist.github.com/wch/2596a1c9f1bcdee91bb210c782141c88 > > > I think that I've gotten about as far with this as I can, though I'd be > > happy to provide more information if anyone wants to take look at the > > problem. > > Dear Winston, > > While I agree this may very well be a bug in R(-devel), and...

...ightly change > the behavior; sometimes the `ls()` returns values from a different > iteration of the loop, and sometimes the problem doesn't happen at all. > I've put a Dockerfile and instructions for reproducing the problem here: > https://gist.github.com/wch/2596a1c9f1bcdee91bb210c782141c88 > I think that I've gotten about as far with this as I can, though I'd be > happy to provide more information if anyone wants to take look at the > problem. Dear Winston, While I agree this may very well be a bug in R(-devel), and hence also R in 3.4.0 alpha and henc...

When running R CMD check on a package, we are encountering an error on R-devel (as of 72457) on Linux. Unfortunately, it is very hard to reproduce, and almost any change to the code makes the error go away. I believe that this is due to a bug in R-devel, which has been present since at least commit 72128 (on 2017-02-06). The test error occurs when R CMD check is run on Travis CI (on Ubuntu