Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "256kbytes".
Did you mean:
56kbytes
2008 Jul 16
1
[Fwd: [Fwd: The results of iozone stress on NFS/ZFS and SF X4500 shows the very bad performance in read but good in write]]
...al performance gain
comparing to their existing systems. However the outputs of the I/O
stress test with iozone show the mixed results as follows:
* The read performance sharply degrades (almost down to 1/20, i.e
from 2,000,000 down to 100,000) when the file sizes are larger
than 256KBytes.
* The write performance remains good (roughly 1,000,000) even with
the file sizes larger than 100MBytes.
The NFS/ZFS server configuraion and the test environment is briefed as
* The ZFS pool for NFS is composed of the 6 disks in stripping with
one on each SATA controller....
2005 Aug 01
4
Input buffer requirement.
Hi all,
I am in the thinking phase of Vorbis 'file' to 'buffer' conversion.
ie, accessing the stream data from the static buffer, rather than
accessing the file from the decoder( the way it is implemented in the
vorbis decoder).
I am putting my understanding and the respective query below,
As the general convention , there are two methods by which i can do this.
1) Assume what
2004 Jul 26
0
FW: IA64 test report: 2.6.8-rc1 /tiger 2004-7-20: Boot Hang!
...core: registered new driver hiddev
usbcore: registered new driver usbhid
drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: v2.0:USB HID core driver
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17
NET: Registered protocol family 2
IP: routing cache hash table of 16384 buckets, 256Kbytes
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 131072 bind 65536)
arp_tables: (C) 2002 David S. Miller
NET: Registered protocol family 1
usb 3-1: new full speed USB device using address 2
hub 3-1:1.0: USB hub found
hub 3-1:1.0: 7 ports detected
NET: Registered protocol family 17
kjournald startin...
2005 Nov 25
28
ZFS and memcntl(..., MC_SYNC, ...)
...39;'s very slow on UFS for large buffers - effectively linear with
the number of pages crossed, or about 6ms per 8KBytes on an otherwise idle
SCSI disk on SPARC. The good news is that this is very fast on ZFS - on the
same disk, about 7ms constant for up to 64KBytes, and about 20ms constant
for 256KBytes. However this is still a bit slower than the msync(3C)
approach on UFS]
Thanks in advance.
--
Philip Beevers
mailto:philip.beevers at ntlworld.com