search for: 256kb

...36.4GB£¨·þÎñÆ÷רÓÃ/37L7206£© ·þÎñÆ÷Ó²ÅÌ\תËÙ:10000ת- ---2400 18.2GB£¨·þÎñÆ÷רÓÃ/37L7205£© ·þÎñÆ÷Ó²ÅÌ\תËÙ:10000ת ----1050 T18350/LW 10000ת\»º´æ:4MB\ÈÝÁ¿:18.3GB-- 700 T36950/LC 10000ת\»º´æ:4MB\ÈÝÁ¿:36.9GB-- 1100 C:CPU 1.7G£¨Socket 478/ºÐ£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.7GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 500 1.6G£¨Socket 478/É¢£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.6GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 500 1.6G£¨Socket 478/ºÐ£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.6GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 510 1.5G£¨Socket 478/É¢£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.5GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 450 4 1.7G£¨Socket 478/É¢£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.7GHz\Í...

...36.4GB£¨·þÎñÆ÷רÓÃ/37L7206£© ·þÎñÆ÷Ó²ÅÌ\תËÙ:10000ת- ---2400 18.2GB£¨·þÎñÆ÷רÓÃ/37L7205£© ·þÎñÆ÷Ó²ÅÌ\תËÙ:10000ת ----1050 T18350/LW 10000ת\»º´æ:4MB\ÈÝÁ¿:18.3GB-- 700 T36950/LC 10000ת\»º´æ:4MB\ÈÝÁ¿:36.9GB-- 1100 C:CPU 1.7G£¨Socket 478/ºÐ£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.7GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 500 1.6G£¨Socket 478/É¢£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.6GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 500 1.6G£¨Socket 478/ºÐ£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.6GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 510 1.5G£¨Socket 478/É¢£© Ö÷Ƶ:1.5GHz\ÍâƵ:400MHz\²å²ÛÀàÐÍ:Socket 478\¶þ¼¶»º´æ:256KB 450 4 1.7G£¨Socket 478/É¢£© Ö÷Ƶ:1....

First I''ll confess my sins, then I''ll beg for help. I own a small wireless ISP, and I sell service at three levels, 256kb/s, 384kb/s, and 512kb/s. For about 18 months, I thought I had this bandwidth limiting figured out. I had three HTB classes off the root, one each with the limits above. Since each customer has a single IP address, I used iptables to mark packets destined for each subscriber with level 1,2 or...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 Summary: Is there a sound reason for MAX_MSG_LENGTH being 256KB? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P4 Component: sftp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: openssh-bugzill a...

We've had a few crashes of CTDB where it tries to allocate > 256kB of memory to "pulldb_data" (assuming that the big number given below is in bytes). Jan 13 15:27:13 nasfe03 ctdbd: server/ctdb_recover.c:352 Failed to expand pulldb_data to 268435485 Jan 13 15:27:13 nasfe03 ctdbd: ctdb fatal error: failed to allocate memory for recovery. shutting dow...

...s[]: 0 0 0 Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: Normal free:0kB min:936kB low:1872kB high:2808kB active:93152kB inactive:747560kB present:901120kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: HighMem free:49280kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:21460kB inactive:25216kB present:98240kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 0kB Feb 4 00:08:23 server...

Hi all, Just watching for my first time the 'oom-killer' call in a CentOS 4.2 workstation. System was running normally but with high load of nice process, iow, rosetta and seti, others appart, nautilus, etc... i realized that after a night of standby running normally, the next moorning after few manual operations from X-session in local console, it started a massive swapping, this time

...e: 3790 ) Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: aa:0 ac:0 id:0 il:0 ic:0 fr:2927 Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: aa:157445 ac:1554 id:301 il:0 ic:0 fr:737 Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: aa:2791 ac:569 id:1 il:0 ic:0 fr:126 Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: 3*4kB 2*8kB 4*16kB 3*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 11708kB) Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: 49*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2948kB) Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: 0*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 504kB)...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1141 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED ------- Comment #3 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2006-10-07 11:43 ------- Change all RESOLVED bug to CLOSED with the exception

...15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: HighMem free:1664kB min:512kB low:1024kB high:1536kB active:29852572kB inactive:2621716kB present:33423360kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: DMA: 2*4kB 5*8kB 3*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12448kB Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 3*8kB 54*16kB 6*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3704kBDec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: HighMem: 4*4kB 54*8kB 0*16kB 18*32kB 4*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096k...

...724kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:0kB slab_unreclaimable:0kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 Node 0 DMA: 2*4kB 0*8kB 2*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 2*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12904kB Node 0 DMA32: 1*4kB 1*8kB 2*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 3*128kB 1*256kB 2*512kB 2*1024kB 2*2048kB 272*4096kB = 1122028kB Node 0 Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 0kB 62219 total pagecache pages 0 pages i...

I have a link to a building (e.g. 10Mb/s) and want to split up the bandwidth to different users. Each user should get e.g., 512kB/s plus 256kB/s dedicated for VoIP. What kind of device can I use for that ? (managing switch ??? which one?) bye Ronald Wiplinger

Hi I am trying to evaluate the quality of the CELT codec by using the 0.8.0 testcelt tool to encode and decode the input. I want to test different bitrates and selected the below parameters for 64, 96, 128, 196, 256kB: ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 256 46 $1.sw $1-64kb.sw ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 192 46 $1.sw $1-96kb.sw ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 128 46 $1.sw $1-128kb.sw ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.exe 44100 2 96 46 $1.sw $1-196kb.sw ./celt-0.8.0/libcelt/testcelt.e...

...30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: HighMem free:2560kB min:512kB low:1024kB high:1536kB active:5735060 kB inactive:161244kB present:8257532kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: DMA: 2*4kB 5*8kB 3*16kB 3*32kB 3*64kB 3*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB 1*102 4kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12544kB Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 28*8kB 2*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0 *1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 896kB Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: HighMem: 512*4kB 8*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*40...

...slab_reclaimable:746356kB slab_unreclaimable:38924kB kernel_stack:5728kB pagetables:20060kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:120kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB (U) 0*32kB 2*64kB (U) 1*128kB (U) 1*256kB (U) 0*512kB 1*1024kB (U) 1*2048kB (U) 3*4096kB (M) = 15888kB DMA32: 1691*4kB (UME) 2651*8kB (UME) 50*16kB (UME) 9*32kB (ME) 7*64kB (E) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 29508kB Normal: 2315*4kB (UME) 167*8kB (UME) 117*16kB (UME) 8*32kB (UE) 3*64kB (E) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*10...

...:26 tcs kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: HighMem free:3578432kB min:512kB low:1024kB high:1536kB active:387344kB inactive:81508kB present:4325372 kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 16kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 896kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: HighMem: 1560*4kB 5190*8kB 4683*16kB 1632*32kB 2304*64kB 1512*128kB 781*256kB 349*512kB 157*1024kB...

...erformance for a 6-drive, hardware RAID 5 array. Please have a look at what I'm doing and let me know if anybody has any suggestions on how to improve the performance... System specs: ----------------- 2 x 2.8GHz Xeons 6GB RAM 1 3ware 9500S-12 2 x 6-drive, RAID 5 arrays with a stripe size of 256KB. Each array is 2.3TB after formatting. ioscheduler set to use the deadline scheduler. mkfs.ext2 options used: ------------------------ mkfs.ext2 -b 4096 -L /d01 -m 1 -O sparse_super,dir_index -R stride=64 -T largefile /dev/sda1 I'm using a stride size of 64 since the ext2 block size is 4KB a...

Hi all, Does anyone have any experience porting libvorbis to platforms with small total memory sizes? Specifically, I'm trying to figure out if it's feasible to run Ogg Vorbis decoding on one of the PlayStation 3's SPU's -- secondary processors with only 256kb of local memory. It looks like out of the box the memory footprint of libvorbis is roughly: ~130k code ~60k static data ~160k heap So clearly there's some work to be done. I have some ideas of things to try... speed isn't a huge issue so I could eliminate some of the lookup tables (e....

...nit+0x64/0xa0 [<c01175e8>] recalc_task_prio+0x88/0x150 [<c02eeedd>] schedule+0x3bd/0x680 [<c0124929>] sys_alarm+0x39/0x60 [<c0114eb0>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x66a [<c0108c17>] error_code+0x2b/0x30 lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 DMA: 1*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 548kB Normal: empty HighMem: empty Swap cache: add 120470, delete 120465, find 45260/94674, race 0+2 Free swap = 2096316kB Total swap = 2096376kB oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2 DMA per-cpu: cpu 0 hot: low 30, high 90, batch 15 cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 30, batch 15 N...

...> pagetables:1328kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:1196kB > local_pcp:152kB free_cma:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 > all_unreclaimable? no > [ 1.971309] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 > [ 1.971316] Node 0 DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB (U) 0*16kB 1*32kB (U) 2*64kB (U) > 1*128kB (U) 1*256kB (U) 0*512kB 1*1024kB (U) 1*2048kB (M) 3*4096kB (M) = > 15912kB > [ 1.971343] Node 0 DMA32: 7*4kB (M) 18*8kB (UM) 7*16kB (EM) 3*32kB > (EM) 1*64kB (E) 2*128kB (UM) 1*256kB (E) 4*512kB (UM) 4*1024kB (UEM) > 4*2048kB (EM) 1011*4096kB (M) = 4156348kB > [ 1.971377] Node 0 Normal: 64...