Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "256f".
Did you mean:
256
2023 Mar 10
1
[PATCH v3 2/6] erofs: convert to use i_blockmask()
...implify code.
>
> Umm... What's the branchpoint for that series? Not the mainline -
> there we have i_blocksize() open-coded...
Actually Yue Hu sent out a clean-up patch and I applied to -next for
almost a week and will be upstreamed for 6.3-rc2:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/a238dca1-256f-ae2f-4a33-e54861fe4ffb at kernel.org/T/#t
And then Yangtao would like to wrap this as a new VFS helper, I'm not
sure why it's necessary since it doesn't save a lot but anyway, I'm open
to it if VFS could have such new helper.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
>
>> Signed-off-by: Yangta...
2023 Mar 10
3
[PATCH v3 2/6] erofs: convert to use i_blockmask()
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 11:21:23PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Use i_blockmask() to simplify code.
Umm... What's the branchpoint for that series? Not the mainline -
there we have i_blocksize() open-coded...
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <frank.li at vivo.com>
> ---
> v3:
> -none
> v2:
> -convert to i_blockmask()
> fs/erofs/data.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1
2024 Jul 03
3
NSD incorrectly logging DNAME as refused?
B.t.w. I've created a PR for it that resolves it (see
https://github.com/NLnetLabs/nsd/pull/346 ), but we may need to discuss
if and how to resolve it first. First I'd like to know if your
configuration is similar in that the CNAME or DNAME target does contain
an allow-query list.
Op 03-07-2024 om 10:52 schreef Willem Toorop via nsd-users:
> Hi Jamie,
>
> I can reproduce,