Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "256588b9".
2009 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] Call to address 0 gets removed
...tcombine actually marks stores to null as
unreachable regardless of the address space of the pointer, unless I'm
missing something subtle.
John.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090610/256588b9/attachment.html>
2009 Jun 10
2
[LLVMdev] Call to address 0 gets removed
2009/6/10 John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com>
> There's another point that hasn't been raised yet here, which is that
> the
> undefinedness of calling (void*) 0 is a property of C, not necessarily
> of
> the LLVM abstract language. I think you can make an excellent case that
> the standard optimizations should not be enforcing C language semantics,
> or at