search for: 2540cube

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "2540cube".

2015 Aug 18
2
Asterisk 13 chan_sip trunk appending @string to dialled number
...the following examples; Asterisk log; app_dial.c: Called SIP/test/0429123456 at CUBE chan_sip.c: Got SIP response 500 "Internal Server Error" back from 172.22.4.12:5060<http://172.22.4.12:5060> In the SIP SDP; INVITE sip:0429920437%40CUBE at 172.22.4.12<mailto:sip%3A0429920437%2540CUBE at 172.22.4.12> SIP/2.0. To: <sip:0429920437%40CUBE at 172.22.4.12<mailto:sip%3A0429920437%2540CUBE at 172.22.4.12>>. As you can see, the @CUBE carries over into the SIP URI as %40CUBE. The FPBX trunk name and outbound route were called CUBE (afaik, purely descriptive) but I change...
2015 Aug 18
5
Asterisk 13 chan_sip trunk appending @string to dialled number
Hello, I'm having what seems like a weird issue connecting Asterisk 13 (FreePBX 12) to a Cisco 2811 router via a chan_sip trunk. Whenever I try dialling out via this trunk, something appends '@CUBE' onto the end of the dialled number, as per the following examples; Asterisk log; app_dial.c: Called SIP/test/0429123456 at CUBE chan_sip.c: Got SIP response 500 "Internal Server
2015 Aug 18
2
Asterisk 13 chan_sip trunk appending @string to dialled number
...st/0429123456 at CUBE > > chan_sip.c: Got SIP response 500 "Internal Server Error" back from > 172.22.4.12:5060 <http://172.22.4.12:5060> > > > > In the SIP SDP; > > INVITE sip:0429920437%40CUBE at 172.22.4.12 <mailto:sip%3A0429920437%2540CUBE at 172.22.4.12> SIP/2.0. > > To: <sip:0429920437%40CUBE at 172.22.4.12 <mailto:sip%3A0429920437%2540CUBE at 172.22.4.12>>. > > > > As you can see, the @CUBE carries over into the SIP URI as %40CUBE. The FPBX trunk name and outbound route were called C...
2015 Aug 18
2
Asterisk 13 chan_sip trunk appending @string to dialled number
Yes indeed. Do you have the dialplan, eg from /etc/asterisk/extensions.conf? Something is getting this OUT_3_SUFFIX variable and including it in a Dial to 172.22.4.12. On 18 August 2015 at 16:21, Brendan Ord <bord at staff.onthenet.com.au> wrote: > Starting to make sense when I saw this line: > > > > [2015-08-18 15:01:33] DEBUG[19366][C-00001cfc]: pbx.c:3785 >