search for: 253m

...emory model on IA32 and the latest stable version of Wine (I tried recompiling it in the new kernel) and I don't have any experimental graphics drivers or other weird stuff running (in fact I'm using Xvnc as the X server just to be sure). I tried running a +relay,+seh,+tid trace (which was 253M big) and there were several trace:seh lines, the first being code c0000005 (access violation) after a call of user32.SetDeskWallPaper but it seems that was handled, and later there was a code c000013a after a load of calls to ReadFile() and then to VirtualAlloc(). It seems NtAllocateVirtualMemory...

...124K 0 30M 204K 0 248M 0 116K 0 36M 201K 0 257M 0 117K 0 40M 202K 0 260M 0 120K 0 45M 205K 0 261M 0 120K 0 49M 201K 0 253M 0 106K 0 41M 178K 0 224M 0 6.8K 0 3.1M 7.4K 0 5.7M 0 5.5K 0 3.2M 5.9K 0 3.5M 0 3.4K 0 1.6M 3.5K 0 1.6M 0 4.3K 0 2.5M 4.8K 0...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 ------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST ------- Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

...Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 128M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 3M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 3M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: -253M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 3M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 4M chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: -1021M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 8M chunk_size: 8M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 26...

Hi, I just installed 2009.06 and found that compression isn''t enabled by default when filesystems are created. Does is make sense to have an RFE open for this? (I''ll open one tonight if need be.) We keep telling people to turn on compression. Are there any situations where turning on compression doesn''t make sense, like rpool/swap? what about rpool/dump? Thanks, ~~sa