search for: 252s

...7 select(5, [4], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [4], left {60, 0}) read(4, "g!\230\315T,\224\247iu\356[\37\220\373\t\37R\201\275{h"..., 8184) = 8184 time(NULL) = 1142443237 select(5, [4], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [4], left {60, 0}) read(4, "\307\252S\200)\320c\237f\216+%\333\255e\244", 8184) = 16 time(NULL) = 1142443237 select(5, [4], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 1 (in [4], left {59, 640000}) read(4, "+R\307\324\377\0\230ui=?\205\251\254Z\n\214\203x\351AF"..., 8184) = 8184 time(NULL)...

..., [4], [], NULL, {60, 0}) =3D 1 (in [4], left {60, 0}) read(4, "g!\230\315T,\224\247iu\356[\37\220\373\t\37R\201\275{h"..., = 8184) =3D 8184 time(NULL) =3D 1142443237 select(5, [4], [], NULL, {60, 0}) =3D 1 (in [4], left {60, 0}) read(4, "\307\252S\200)\320c\237f\216+%\333\255e\244", 8184) =3D 16 time(NULL) =3D 1142443237 select(5, [4], [], NULL, {60, 0}) =3D 1 (in [4], left {59, = 640000}) read(4, "+R\307\324\377\0\230ui=3D?\205\251\254Z\n\214\203x\351AF"..., = 8184) =3D 8184 time(NULL)...

...have been less than 40% (which we saw when > building the Apache HTTP server). > > > I expect this to be reproducible on most non-trivial C/C++ programs. > But taking clang as an example, just running `ninja clang` on OS X a > not-so-recent 12-cores machine takes 970s with LTO and 252s without (and I > believe this is without debug info...). > Running just `ninja` to build all of llvm/clang here would take *a lot* > longer with LTO, and not so much without. > > The LTO builds without assert > > Best, > > -- > Mehdi > > > > > > We...

Hey Mehdi, Thank you for your comments. I've CC'd the CSI mailing list with your comments and put my responses inline. Please let me know any other questions you have. Cheers, TB On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2016, at 9:01 AM, TB Schardl via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >

...gt;> building the Apache HTTP server). >>> >>> >>> I expect this to be reproducible on most non-trivial C/C++ programs. >>> But taking clang as an example, just running `ninja clang` on OS X a >>> not-so-recent 12-cores machine takes 970s with LTO and 252s without (and I >>> believe this is without debug info...). >>> Running just `ninja` to build all of llvm/clang here would take *a lot* >>> longer with LTO, and not so much without. >>> >>> The LTO builds without assert >>> >>> Best, &gt...

.... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I expect this to be reproducible on most non-trivial C/C++ programs. >>>>> But taking clang as an example, just running `ninja clang` on OS X a >>>>> not-so-recent 12-cores machine takes 970s with LTO and 252s without (and I >>>>> believe this is without debug info...). >>>>> Running just `ninja` to build all of llvm/clang here would take *a >>>>> lot* longer with LTO, and not so much without. >>>>> >>>>> The LTO builds without as...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5478 Summary: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other URL: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1959 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal