Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "250235".
Did you mean:
20235
2009 Jul 23
5
Random # generator accuracy
Dan Nordlund wrote:
"It would be necessary to see the code for your 'brief test' before anyone
could meaningfully comment on your results. But your results for a single
test could have been a valid "random" result."
I've re-created what I did below. The problem appears to be with the
weighting process: the unweighted sample came out much closer to the actual