search for: 24x7linux

...0, eth1, eth2, eth3 on the box. I also can ping beyond eth0 and eth1. what i can not do is ping beyond eth2 and eth3. I have tried several table statements and played with pref to no avail. any insight would be helpful! -----Original Message----- From: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez [mailto:lartc@24x7linux.com] Sent: Tue 9/10/2002 2:39 PM To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Cc: Subject: Re: [LARTC] 4 nic advanced routing question On Tuesday, 10 September 2002, at 12:34:10 -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote: > I''m not sure why you''re having a problem: > His document was encoded properly...

...hanks for helping me. Now I'm gonna configure the network with IPv6 'cause I have to make it work with Mobile IPv6. Anybody working on these funny things can mail me, so we can suffer togheter! :-) Bye, Mauro -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez [mailto:lartc@24x7linux.com] Inviato: ven 22/11/2002 1.03 A: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl Cc: Oggetto: Re: [LARTC] Routing problem On Wednesday, 20 November 2002, at 18:31:42 +0100, Mauro Cerboni wrote: > I have 3 routers (Linux boxes with Red Hat 8.0 server), with iproute2 and ip_forward activated; they are...

Hi All, I did a google search on this and didn''t find exactly what I was looking for. Suppose I have a machine that has an IP alias eth0:0. I have set up HTB.init so that it properly throttles bandwidth on eth0, however when I use eth0:0, it doesn''t work. I read elsewhere that it should work at the PHYSICAL device layer, and should therefore work for both at once. This is not

I tried installing the WonderShaper on my internal link, mostly to get the SFQ installed. I set uplink and downlink to 100000 to match the link speed and changed the bandwidth on the cbq line to 100mbit. This killed transfer speed *to* the box, knocking it from 30-40 Mbps down to about 800 kbps. Commenting out just the ingress control restored the speed. What about the ingress policer would do