search for: 24t

...meone can help me, I cannot seem to get a system's ethernet interface to correctly work in promiscuous mode... I have a Centos 6.4 system with 2 bnx2 interfaces on it. I have set up eth1 in promiscuous mode and am sending traffic to it using the port mirroring configuration on a Nortel 3510-24T switch. The switch reports that it is sending a fair amount of traffic to the mirror port. However, within Centos 6.4, I only see broadcast traffic from the switch: [root at host eth1]# ifconfig eth1 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:19:B9:E2:30:AE UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC...

...3% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor2data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor2data:/volumedisk1 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 [root at stor3 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 25T 638G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdb2 25T 654G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 /dev/sdd1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_d/glusterfs/vol1 stor3data:/volumedisk0 101T 3...

...medisk0 > 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 > stor2data:/volumedisk1 > 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 > > > [root at stor3 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 25T 638G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdb2 25T 654G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 > /dev/sdd1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_d/glusterfs/vol1 > stor3data:/volumedisk0 >...

...101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 >> stor2data:/volumedisk1 >> 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 >> >> >> [root at stor3 ~]# df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/sdb1 25T 638G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 >> /dev/sdb2 25T 654G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 >> /dev/sdc1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 >> /dev/sdd1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_d/glusterfs/vol1 >> stor3data:/volum...

Thanks for the work on gluster. We have a situation where we need a very large virtual machine image. We use a simple raw image but it can be up to 40T in size in some cases. For this experiment we?ll call it 24T. When creating the image on fuse with qemu-img, using falloc preallocation, the qemu-img create fails and a fuse error results. This happens after around 3 hours. I created a simple C program using gfapi that does the fallocate of 10T and it to 1.25 hours. I didn?t run tests at larger than that a...

.../volumedisk0 >>> stor2data:/volumedisk1 >>> 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 >>> >>> >>> [root at stor3 ~]# df -h >>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>> /dev/sdb1 25T 638G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 >>> /dev/sdb2 25T 654G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 >>> /dev/sdc1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 >>> /dev/sdd1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_d/glusterfs/vol1 >>>...

...t; stor2data:/volumedisk1 >>>> 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 >>>> >>>> >>>> [root at stor3 ~]# df -h >>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>> /dev/sdb1 25T 638G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 >>>> /dev/sdb2 25T 654G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 >>>> /dev/sdc1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 >>>> /dev/sdd1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_d/glusterfs/vol1 &...

...1 >>>>> 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> [root at stor3 ~]# df -h >>>>> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >>>>> /dev/sdb1 25T 638G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 >>>>> /dev/sdb2 25T 654G 24T 3% /mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 >>>>> /dev/sdc1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 >>>>> /dev/sdd1 50T 15T 35T 30% /mnt/disk_d/glus...

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

...Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux NFS client: Linux nx8.priv 2.6.18-238.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue May 31 13:22:04 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The NFS server is exporting a XFS filesystem: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/vgXX-lvXX 24T 16T 8.2T 66% /export User foo (for anonymity) added ~3TB of data in the last 2-3 days. On the NFS server, her quota is reported as ~5.8 TB: Disk quotas for user foo (uid 1314): Filesystem blocks quota limit grace files quota limit grace /dev/mapper/vgXXX-lvXXX...

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

Well, I''ve searched my brains out and I can''t seem to find a reason for this. I''m getting bad to medium performance with my new test storage device. I''ve got 24 1.5T disks with 2 SSDs configured as a zil log device. I''m using the Areca raid controller, the driver being arcmsr. Quad core AMD with 16 gig of RAM OpenSolaris upgraded to snv_134. The zpool

...nsfers from a Samba 2.2.8a server. Samba server: P4/2.2GHz, ServerWorks chipset, SCSI UW2 disk subsystem (Bonnie++ tested to 35MB/sec), 3Com (acenic) gigabit ethernet Win2kPro: P3/700, 3Com Vortex 100mbit network card Win2kServer: P3/800, 3Com Vortex 100mbit network card Switch: Baystack 350-24T with fiber gigabit module No registry hacking done to either client (and in previous testing, no amount of TCP/IP hacking on Win2kPro helped) Samba config file changes: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=65536 SO_RCVBUF=65536 max xmit = 65536 read size = 65536 getwd cache = Yes...

Hi. To begin with, I have a freshly built RedHat Linux 8.0 box running samba 2.2.8a. The kernel version is 2.4.18-14. I downloaded and compiled samba from source. I am using LPRng-3.8.9-6 as my printing system. The attached printer is a Lexmark Z22 printer and it is attached to the parralel port. Problem: For the life of me, I can't get NT type clients, NT4, 2K and XP to print to samba.