search for: 2495

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2495 Bug ID: 2495 Summary: add GSI GSSAPI SSO authentication to OpenSSH Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Compo...

...434m? 17m? 11m R 14.9? 0.5? 17:24.44 smbd 2838 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 433m? 17m? 11m R 14.3? 0.5? 11:46.12 smbd 1657 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 429m? 19m? 12m R 13.9? 0.5? 15:17.44 smbd 2841 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 434m? 17m? 10m R 13.9? 0.5? 14:31.61 smbd 2221 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 429m? 15m 9972 R 13.6? 0.4? 14:51.52 smbd 2495 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 425m? 12m 9.8m R 13.6? 0.3? 12:17.84 smbd 2837 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 434m? 20m? 13m R 13.6? 0.5? 17:46.70 smbd 2869 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 432m? 12m 7920 R 13.6? 0.3? 19:38.08 smbd 3605 XXXXX? 20?? 0? 433m? 15m 9.9m R 13.6? 0.4? 11:32.85 smbd 2277 XXXXX??? 20?? 0? 429m? 13m? 10m R 13.3? 0.4...

...r 0 0 0 1 0 2450 1 26 190 white 1 0 0 0 0 2466 1 14 101 other 1 0 0 0 1 2466 1 28 95 white 1 0 0 1 0 2466 1 14 100 other 0 0 0 1 0 2495 1 23 94 other 1 0 0 0 0 2495 1 17 142 black 0 1 0 0 0 2495 1 21 130 white 1 1 0 1 0 2495

...>> master results on Solaris 11.5/SPARC for all targets between a 1-stage >> build with gcc 9.1.0 and a 2-stage build shows a similar pattern: >> >> * 1-stage: >> >> Expected Passes : 53734 >> Expected Failures : 205 >> Unsupported Tests : 2495 >> Unexpected Passes : 1 >> Unexpected Failures: 228 >> >> * 2-stage: >> >> Expected Passes : 45756 >> Expected Failures : 205 >> Unsupported Tests : 2495 >> Unexpected Passes : 2 >> Unexpected Failures: 7303 >>...

...0/day) on it and guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought our brand new card), "officially, fax communications is not supported with Digium cards" ( http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+fax ). Of course, I should have guessed that it is far too much to ask to a $2495 card ! Is the "fax" extension in Asterisk just there to push us to the competing products ? We hesitated to buy another Digium card after the problems with TE410P, but I told myself it was nice to support Asterisk by buying some Digium cards. Now Digium make us regret our buys and a disa...

...700 760 791 792 809 822 845 944 1005 1077 1116 1125 1218 1369 [33] 1392 1400 1431 1492 1625 1642 1673 1674 1706 1766 1767 1795 1815 1826 1851 1857 [49] 2006 2010 2070 2084 2099 2121 2160 2191 2223 2230 2236 2314 2345 2400 2422 2434 [65] 2435 2495 2556 2557 2587 2588 2678 2802 2815 2833 2844 2860 2861 2910 2922 2953 [81] 2989 3010 3012 3014 3091 3167 3186 3226 3227 3242 3318 3346 3380 3448 3560 3561 [97] 3590 3773 3775 3805 3837 3895 3932 3943 3962 3987 4119 4139 4201 4206 4224 4232 [113] 4249...

...at end a number of Workshops are planned. * Again please read the detailed CFP for more information: http://www.bellua.com/bcs2005/asia05.cfp.html Please send the workshop proposal to cfp2005@bellua.com as soon as possible and no later than 20 December 2005. Phone (GMT+7): +62 815 910 2495 Thanks & regards, 1. Name, title, address, email and phone number 2. Draft of the proposed presentation (in PDF, PowerPoint or Keynote format), proof of concept for tools and exploits, etc. 3. Short biography, qualification, occupation, achievement and affiliations (limit...

...de on dovecots virtual mailboxes (plugin virtual in a separate virtual namespace) If i try to open this email in its original directory, it gets opened without any problem. So, when i try to open it from within the virtual mailbox, i get this error: ---8<------ Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Panic: file index-mail-binary.c: line 586 (index_mail_get_binary_stream): assertion failed: (mail->data.stream != NULL) Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x95272) [0x7f671137e272] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/li...

...April 2006 (again a few months after we bought >> our brand new card), "officially, fax communications is not >> supported with Digium cards" ( http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+fax ). >> Of course, I should have guessed that it is far too much to ask >> to a $2495 card ! Is the "fax" extension in Asterisk just there >> to push us to the competing products ? >> >> We hesitated to buy another Digium card after the problems with >> TE410P, but I told myself it was nice to support Asterisk by >> buying some Digium cards. N...

...lugin virtual in a separate virtual > namespace) > If i try to open this email in its original directory, it gets opened > without any problem. > > So, when i try to open it from within the virtual mailbox, i get this error: > ---8<------ > Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Panic: file > index-mail-binary.c: line 586 (index_mail_get_binary_stream): assertion > failed: (mail->data.stream != NULL) > Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Error: Raw > backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x95272) [0x7f671137e272] >...

...virtual >> namespace) >> If i try to open this email in its original directory, it gets opened >> without any problem. >> >> So, when i try to open it from within the virtual mailbox, i get this error: >> ---8<------ >> Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Panic: file >> index-mail-binary.c: line 586 (index_mail_get_binary_stream): assertion >> failed: (mail->data.stream != NULL) >> Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Error: Raw >> backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x95272) [0x7f6...

...> If i try to open this email in its original directory, it gets opened >>> without any problem. >>> >>> So, when i try to open it from within the virtual mailbox, i get >>> this error: >>> ---8<------ >>> Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Panic: file >>> index-mail-binary.c: line 586 (index_mail_get_binary_stream): assertion >>> failed: (mail->data.stream != NULL) >>> Nov 14 23:29:52 aldebaran dovecot[2495]: imap(jakob): Error: Raw >>> backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(...

...tadata !"ISPDIL_MTHD_isLocked"} !2491 = metadata !{metadata !"ISPDIL_MTHD_unlock"} !2492 = metadata !{metadata !"ISPDIL_MTHD_IndexWriter"} !2493 = metadata !{metadata !"ISPDIL_MTHD_optimize"} !2494 = metadata !{metadata !"ISPDIL_MTHD_~IndexWriter"} !2495 = metadata !{metadata !"ISPDIL_MTHD_Init"} !2496 = metadata !{%"class.lucene::document::Document" zeroinitializer} .... And I have in console: invoke void %16(%"class.lucene::index::IndexWriter"* %storemerge) to label %if.end24 unwind label %lpad, !tbaa !...

...d: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.downes at ligo.org --- Comment #8 from Tom Downes <thomas.downes at ligo.org> --- I have created bug 2495 on the latest version of openssh and marked it within the kerberos/GSSAPI component. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

...----------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Tom Downes <thomas.downes at ligo.org> --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2495 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

...tead of `OB` in some cases), and we seem to lack a consistent approach to "ECO mode" as well (whatever vendors might mena by that, what NUT reflects it as and whether/how it shows up in the status or can be or not be managed from SW to HW). * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2495 * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2496 Insights and inputs would be welcome, not in the least to standardize on a status and command name approach that would best suit the mix of different vendors' concepts. Thanks in advance, Jim Klimov -------------- next part --------------...

...0 1 304 303 786 0 1 321 306 787 0 1 2477 1 788 0 1 2490 2 789 0 1 2491 1 790 0 1 2492 1 791 0 1 2495 266 792 0 1 7047 1 793 0 1 7052 1 794 0 1 7055 4 795 0 1 7057 1 796 0 1 7058 1 797 0 1 7059 1 798...

Since caller ID does not work with my FXO card, I am wondering if Asterisk supports the following extensions functionality. When a call comes in, I'd like to give the caller an opportunity to enter an extension if he/she knows it; if not, Asterisk will dial one or more default handsets. I know Asterisk can do this, but is it possible to change the default "caller id" when the call

...n the second problem: I download the latest version 3.0.21c, build it just as I did the previous but when I go to rejoin the domain I get this error; # /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc join -UAdministrator%xxxxxxxxx [2006/03/10 21:15:48, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_key(2495) cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_key: cli_rpc_pipe_bind failed with error NT_STATUS_NETWORK_ACCESS_DENIED [2006/03/10 21:15:48, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_newstyle(337) Error in domain join verification (schannel setup failed): NT_STATUS_NETWORK_ACCESS_DENIED Unable to join domain...

Running the latest * CVS and Cisco 7960G and 7940G phones with SIP 6.3 image. I have figured out how to turn on the DND feature through the Settings>Call Preferences>Do Not Disturb - Yes then Save. This puts the phone into DND On and shows a DND image above the far right soft key which you use to turn off DND. There should be a better way. An on/off toggle of the soft key that it