search for: 244m

I have my 640GB USB drive connected to a CentOS 5 server and using fdisk, it seems to show a partition of the correct size, /dev/sdd1, but after mounting, the drive shows only 244M size. Does the message received when running fdisk below mean I should reformat this drive, I can't seemed to figure out how to do that with fdisk. Can someone tell me how to reformat, if needed? The drive is empty, I formatted a while back on a Debian machine.... [root at vhost1 ~]# /sbin/fdi...

...d 90 minutes for 2000k docs. But after that, it's very slow. It took about 3 weeks to get the following database: number of documents = 8330000 average document length = 10.8826 I noticed that when the indexing process became very slow, CPU use was only 0%- 1%, but memory use mounted to VSZ 244M RSS180M. considering we have 2G RAM, I wonder whether we have a way to utilize our machine more to get better performance with indexing. Question: How can I expedite our indexer? Did I do sth wrong with my indexer? BTW, I set the following env parameters: XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD_LENGTH=5000000...

...0394103 155.6 > b <- x > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 187646 5.1 407500 10.9 Vcells 30036061 229.2 30394103 231.9 > And at the end the top command shows: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND 18068 gardar 1 42 0 244M 241M sleep 0:08 3.47% R.bin Now, starting removing the objects: > rm(b) > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 187646 5.1 407500 10.9 Vcells 20036061 152.9 30394103 231.9 > rm(a) > gc() used (Mb) gc trigger (Mb) Ncells 187652 5.1 407500...

...nfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls failed error code was (0x0) Could not check secret And Top load averages: 3.10, 2.40, 1.54 14:48:54 114 processes: 113 idle CPU states: 4.8% user, 0.0% nice, 88.6% system, 0.8% interrupt, 0.0% idle Memory: 192M/247M act/tot Free: 244M Swap: 0K/1024M used/tot PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU COMMAND 27743 root 2 0 1620K 2752K sleep select 0:31 94.83% winbindd 31271 nobody 2 0 165M 165M sleep poll 15:21 1.51% squid 1446 root 10 0 92K 412K sleep na...

...50 httpd 23299 nobody 15 0 334m 86m 42m S 0.0 2.2 1:13.35 httpd --- centos 4.8 --- $ uname -a Linux ws89 2.6.9-89.0.28.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Aug 20 16:11:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 25117 nobody 16 0 244m 57m 41m S 0.0 1.5 0:58.23 httpd 21318 nobody 15 0 240m 53m 41m S 0.0 1.3 0:53.25 httpd 18517 nobody 16 0 239m 51m 41m S 0.0 1.3 0:41.97 httpd 10383 nobody 15 0 238m 50m 40m S 0.0 1.3 0:31.07 httpd 29560 nobody 16 0 239m 49m 39m S 0.0 1.3 0:40.39...

...with a new mail handling setup and it involves a single IMAP folder with just under 70'000 messages. When OfflineIMAP connects to the server, the imap process starts to eat up a lot of memory: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 15607 madduck 35 19 283m 244m 239m D 16.9 49.3 0:09.96 imap On the contrary, when "online" client, such as Thunderbird connect, memory usage is around 10m, which is entirely acceptable. The way offlineimap reads may is by FETCHing metadata, then APPENDing new local mail, SEARCHing for the UIDs of each uploaded mai...

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a