Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "23d89eb0".
2014 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] Clarification on the backward compatibility promises
On 18 June 2014 17:10, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Do others agree that this is the case or at least that this would be a
>> >> reasonable balance?
>> > IMO it's easier to be compatible on .ll level, no?
>>
>> That is not my experience with the bitcode format. The way the API is
>> structured makes it really easy