search for: 2373

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2373 Bug ID: 2373 Summary: memory leak in sshd.c:2262 Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: sshd A...

rake aborted! /home/Mahesh/uma/myapp/Rakefile:6: unterminated string meets end of file /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `load'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `raw_load_rakefile'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2007:in `block in load_rakefile'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2058:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2006:in `load_rake...

Does anyone has any experience with this server i wonder i it supports iommu. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

...0(+0x7b57f) [0x7f34cd27c57f] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x7b5de) [0x7f34cd27c5de] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7f34cd22b0d5] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot-storage.so.0(+0xb5391) [0x7f34cd5a6391] -> dovecot/imap [---- at ---.com xx.xx.xx.xx UID FETCH - 2373 bytes waiting](imap_sync_more+0xce) [0x7f34cda5ad2e] -> dovecot/imap [---- at ---.com xx.xx.xx.xx UID FETCH - 2373 bytes waiting](+0x22344) [0x7f34cda5b344] -> dovecot/imap [---- at ---.com xx.xx.xx.xx UID FETCH - 2373 bytes waiting](cmd_sync_delayed+0x1bf) [0x7f34cda5b67f] -> dovecot...

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz.sig A few fixes and some imapc improvements since the release candidate. * dbox: Resyncing (e.g. doveadm force-resync) no longer deletes dovecot.index.cache file. The cache file was rarely the problem so this just caused unnecessary slowness. * Mailbox name limits changed during

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.16.tar.gz.sig A few fixes and some imapc improvements since the release candidate. * dbox: Resyncing (e.g. doveadm force-resync) no longer deletes dovecot.index.cache file. The cache file was rarely the problem so this just caused unnecessary slowness. * Mailbox name limits changed during

...r mistakenly optimizes expr "x * y / y" into x where the x*y is blindly flagged with nsw without any analysis. The preproceeded code is excerpted bellow: cat -n integer.i --------------------------------- 2361 TypHandle ProdInt ( hdL, hdR ) 2362 TypHandle hdL, hdR; 2363 { .... 2373 if ( (int)hdL & (int)hdR & 1 ) { 2374 2375 2376 i = ((int)hdL - 1) * ((int)hdR >> 1); /* !!! No barbaric NSW, please !!! */ 2377 if ( ((int)hdR >> 1) == 0 || i / ((int)hdR >> 1) == ((int)hdL-1) ) { --------------------------------- I catch the c...

...d temp 1 5 26 27 31 31 2 6 9 30 30 30 3 7 26 31 31 31 4 8 26 28 31 31 5 9 29 30 30 30 > cast(aqm, month ~ variable, sum) month ozone solar.r wind temp 1 5 614 4895 360.3 2032 2 6 265 5705 308.0 2373 3 7 1537 6711 277.2 2601 4 8 1559 4812 272.6 2603 5 9 912 5023 305.4 2307 > cast(aqm, month ~ variable, mean) Error in get(as.character(FUN), mode = "function", envir = envir) : variable "fun" of mode "function" was not found > Our...

HI all, I have just setup the ROR environment on a vps, but once i created the app and run rails s or db:create after modifying the database.yml it keeps on appearing with the "Could not find gem sqlite3" etc message which i know this as it''s not install as i am using mysql. What else have i got to do other than modifying the database.yml as to me it''s still looking

...y/1.9.1/gems/railties-3.0.9/lib/rails/application.rb:139:in `load_tasks'' /app/.bundle/gems/ruby/1.9.1/gems/railties-3.0.9/lib/rails/application.rb:77:in `method_missing'' /app/Rakefile:7:in `<top (required)>'' /usr/ruby1.9.2/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `load'' /usr/ruby1.9.2/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `raw_load_rakefile'' /usr/ruby1.9.2/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2007:in `block in load_rakefile'' /usr/ruby1.9.2/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2058:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr/ruby1.9.2/lib/ruby/...

...to x where the x*y is blindly > flagged with nsw without any analysis. > > The preproceeded code is excerpted bellow: > > cat -n integer.i > --------------------------------- > 2361 TypHandle ProdInt ( hdL, hdR ) > 2362 TypHandle hdL, hdR; > 2363 { > .... > 2373 if ( (int)hdL & (int)hdR & 1 ) { > 2374 > 2375 > 2376 i = ((int)hdL - 1) * ((int)hdR >> 1); /* !!! No barbaric NSW, please !!! */ > 2377 if ( ((int)hdR >> 1) == 0 || i / ((int)hdR >> 1) == ((int)hdL-1) ) { > -----------------------------...

...211 0 253 352 0 0 0 C-50 0 0 0 211 1032 1701 50 0 54 56 0 0 0 C-90 64 0 65 260 769 876 0 0 87 0 0 91 96 C-127-1 0 0 127 149 364 3990 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C-164 0 0 0 68 179 2373 0 0 105 0 0 0 0 C-198 0 0 0 89 327 1458 314 0 209 298 0 0 0 C-226 0 0 0 0 206 858 0 0 363 304 0 0 0 C-268 0 0 0 75 270 629 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 C-294-C 54 0 0 112 379...

...Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter: loganaden at gmail.com Created attachment 2373 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2373&action=edit potential_overflow_fix in serverloop.c: max_time_milliseconds = options.client_alive_interval * 1000; client_alive_interval is declare as int. int client_alive_interval; /*...

...ks/rails.rb: 11:in `each'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rails-2.3.8/lib/tasks/rails.rb: 11:in `<top (required)>'' /root/.coupa-1.5/Rakefile.rb:10:in `require'' /root/.coupa-1.5/Rakefile.rb:10:in `<top (required)>'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `load'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `raw_load_rakefile'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2007:in `block in load_rakefile'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2058:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2006:in `load_rake...

...nd something? Then the encryption would make no sense at all, right? For what purpose was the plugin developed? Can anyone explain this to me? Best regards Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2373 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190914/e280d5ac/attachment.p7s>

...ks/rails.rb: 11:in `each'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/rails-2.3.8/lib/tasks/rails.rb: 11:in `<top (required)>'' /root/.coupa-1.5/Rakefile.rb:10:in `require'' /root/.coupa-1.5/Rakefile.rb:10:in `<top (required)>'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `load'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2373:in `raw_load_rakefile'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2007:in `block in load_rakefile'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2058:in `standard_exception_handling'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rake.rb:2006:in `load_rake...

...i) { callMemberFunction (obj, b[i]) (); } return 0; } // ----------- end bug.cpp ----------- This is how you can reproduce the internal compiler error: % gcc -c bug.cpp % bug.cpp: In function `int main(int, char **)': % bug.cpp:20: Internal compiler error in `const_hash', at varasm.c:2373 % Please submit a full bug report. % See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions. I have tested the same source (which is an adoption from the C++ FAQ-lite, http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/pointers-to-members.html) an the following systems: Success: GCC 2.9...

.../var/log/glusterfs/glusterd.log) in REJECTED node, and find some log like below [2014-06-17 04:21:11.266398] I [glusterd-handler.c:2050:__glusterd_handle_incoming_friend_req] 0-glusterd: Received probe from uuid: 81857e74-a726-4f48-8d1b-c2a4bdbc094f [2014-06-17 04:21:11.266485] E [glusterd-utils.c:2373:glusterd_compare_friend_volume] 0-management: Cksums of volume supportgfs differ. local cksum = 52468988, remote cksum = 2201279699 on peer 172.26.178.254 [2014-06-17 04:21:11.266542] I [glusterd-handler.c:3085:glusterd_xfer_friend_add_resp] 0-glusterd: Responded to 172.26.178.254 (0), ret: 0 [2014...

...47.855781 IP 66.1.2.3.922 > 66.9.8.7.55318: P 1920:1968(48) ack 2261 win 9968 <nop,nop,timestamp 8735300 43844116> 11:26:47.856142 IP 66.9.8.7.55318 > 66.1.2.3.922: . ack 1968 win 2548 <nop,nop,timestamp 43844240 8735300> 11:26:47.857866 IP 66.9.8.7.55318 > 66.1.2.3.922: P 2261:2373(112) ack 1968 win 2548 <nop,nop,timestamp 43844242 8735300> 11:26:48.072776 IP 66.1.2.3.922 > 66.9.8.7.55318: P 1968:2016(48) ack 2373 win 9968 <nop,nop,timestamp 8735316 43844242> 11:26:48.321959 IP 66.1.2.3.922 > 66.9.8.7.55318: P 1968:2016(48) ack 2373 win 9968 <nop,nop,time...

Hi, I have a 3 nodes replica (including arbiter) volume with GlusterFS 3.8.11 and this night one of my nodes (node1) had an out of memory for some unknown reason and as such the Linux OOM killer has killed the glusterd and glusterfs process. I restarted the glusterd process but now that node is in "Peer Rejected" state from the other nodes and from itself it rejects the two other nodes