Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "2346d49b".
Did you mean:
234649
2017 May 16
2
[RFC] Canonicalization of unsigned subtraction with saturation
Hi,
This message is a result of a discussion of backend optimization for sub(max) pattern(https://reviews.llvm.org/D25987), which can be either converted to unsigned min-max or unsigned saturation instruction(if the target supports it).
Currently these versions of the code produce different IR(and we need to manage both types in backend):
(1.16)
void foo(unsigned short *p, unsigned short max,
2017 May 16
2
[RFC] Canonicalization of unsigned subtraction with saturation
...Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170516/2346d49b/attachment.html>