Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "2335248".
2011 Jun 14
0
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?
Hi Andrew,
> No. Duncan suggested that he could hitch a ride with us through France. The problem is, we're not driving to Spain at all and there doesn't appear to be any place to transfer.
>
> The point is, you're not going to be able to leverage most of a CFG-based optimizing compiler if don't use the CFG to express control flow.
when Chris first came up with his
2011 Jun 15
1
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?
...39;t notice a significant score change in either case, though that's not really what I was interested in.
** lencod trunk (unmodified)
Program | GCCAS Bytecode LLC compile LLC-BETA compile JIT codegen | GCC CBE LLC LLC-BETA JIT | GCC/CBE GCC/LLC GCC/LLC-BETA LLC/LLC-BETA
lencod | 6.9222 2335248 8.6951 * * | * * 7.2000 * * | n/a n/a n/a n/a
opt Total Execution Time: 6.9222 seconds (6.9200 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- --- Name ---
1.0654 ( 16.0%) 0.0024 ( 0.9%)...
2011 Jun 13
8
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?
On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:29 AM, John McCall wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 4:40 PM, John McCall wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jun 12, 2011, at 1:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Sohail,
>>>>>