Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "232027".
Did you mean:
2320,7
2015 Mar 11
9
[LLVMdev] On LLD performance
I spent a week to optimize LLD performance and just wanted to share things
what I found. Also if there's anyone who have a good idea on how to make it
faster, I'd like to hear.
My focus is mainly on Windows, but my optimizations are generally platform
neutral. I aim both single-thread and multi-thread performance.
r231434 <http://reviews.llvm.org/rL231454> is a change that has the
2015 Mar 13
3
[LLVMdev] On LLD performance
...gger
> .eh_frame: 438 376 bytes bigger
> .comment: 77 797 bytes bigger
> .data.rel.ro: 48 056 bytes bigger
Did you try --merge-strings with lld ? --gc-sections
>
> The comment section is bigger because it has multiple copies of
>
> clang version 3.7.0 (trunk 232021) (llvm/trunk 232027)
>
> The lack of duplicate entry merging would also explain the size
> difference of .rodata and .eh_frame. No idea why .data.rel.ro is
> bigger.
>
> So, with the big warning that both linkers are not doing exactly the
> same thing, the performance numbers I got were:
>
>...