Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "23004".
Did you mean:
2004
2002 Feb 14
1
W2K problems
...her shares. My smb.conf
is attached.
I hope that someone can point me in the right direction as I am beating
my head against the wall here.
Andrew.
The client log is here (trimmed)
==========================
[2002/02/14 11:19:34, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(319)
12 user groups:
21001 23004 23001 23003 3001 13401 12001 9001 16001 16004 22001 16005
[2002/02/14 11:19:34, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(201)
change_to_user uid=(0,1005) gid=(0,21001)
[2002/02/14 11:19:34, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_ChDir(669)
vfs_ChDir to /export/t12s0
[2002/02/14 11:19:34, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(615)...
2015 Aug 22
0
PROXY protocol
...y = yes
port = 23003
ssl = yes
}
}
service pop3-login {
service_count = 1
vsz_limit = 128 M
inet_listener {
haproxy = yes
port = 23002
ssl = no
}
inet_listener {
haproxy = yes
port = 23004
ssl = yes
}
}
...and everything seems to be working fine. Obviously, the proxy sends
requests to different ports. For example, requests received by the proxy
at port 993 are sent to dovecot's port 23003 etc.
If you think the config could be better/cleaner, I would apprec...
2015 Aug 22
4
PROXY protocol
Op 8/21/2015 om 1:31 PM schreef Nikolaos Milas:
> On 20/8/2015 11:09 ??, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>
>> As soon as I manage to re-build Dovecot with the latest snapshot,
>> I'll test it!
>
> Hello,
>
> I've built dovecot with a today snapshot from hg
> (dovecot-2-2-9f815e781beb) and I am trying to enable haproxy.
>
> I configured as follows (lines added
2006 Feb 12
16
Mongrel 0.3.1 -- New Site/Runs Right
Hello All,
Yet another release of Mongrel proudly pushed out for everyone to review and
comment on. This time though, I''ve done up a little website that''s *way*
better than the plan Rdoc that used to stand in for the site like a
one-legged leper.
* http://mongrel.rubyforge.net/
As you should already know, Mongrel is a fast HTTP server and library for
Ruby partially written in
2005 Aug 09
43
Some patches.
Hi,
in my path of getting the controls sample to work nicely, I fixed some
classes on the way, see the attached diffs. I had some difficulties, but
could track down all stupid bugs and am now almost happy with the code
:)
(I had the complete ImageHandler hieracy implemented at some time, but
than I discovered the error was not in unloaded ImageHandlers but in the
controls-program which does not