search for: 22e15466

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "22e15466".

Did you mean: 2211546
[LLVMdev] struct with signed bitfield (PR17827)
2013 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] struct with signed bitfield (PR17827)
...> LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131116/22e15466/attachment.html>
[LLVMdev] struct with signed bitfield (PR17827)
2013 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] struct with signed bitfield (PR17827)
On 2013 Nov 15, at 19:41, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > I don’t have the C/C++ standards in front of me but IIRC whether a char/short/int/long/long long bitfield is signed or unsigned is implementation defined. You need to explicitly specify signed or unsigned in order to have any guarantee of the signedness, e.g. signed int. Section 3.9.1 of the C++11 standard [1]