Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "2291546b".
Did you mean:
2211546
2014 Jun 17
3
[LLVMdev] Clarification on the backward compatibility promises
A bit of history first:
Back when we transitioned from bytecode to bitcode (2.0) we had a tool
called llvm-upgrade which would read .ll files from 1.9 and output 2.0
format which could then be passed to llvm-as to produce bitcode.
The release notes for 2.3 note that llvm-upgrade was not supported any more.
During the 2.X development we tried to keep reading older bitcodes.
Once we got to 3.1,