Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "228875".
Did you mean:
22875
2020 Jul 24
2
samba4 kerberized nfs4 with sssd ad client
...A 389 server, but I would not recommend that
now that the AD implementation of Samba is robust enough.
Note: Now that CentOS 8 where mentioned early on the list, CentOS 8
clients joined to a Samba domain using SSSD works pretty well. Some tips
at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228875.html
2020 Jul 24
2
samba4 kerberized nfs4 with sssd ad client
...now that the AD implementation of Samba is
>> robust enough.
>>
>> Note: Now that CentOS 8 where mentioned early on the list, CentOS 8
>> clients joined to a Samba domain using SSSD works pretty well. Some
>> tips at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228875.html
>>
>>
>>
> Robert, I have said numerous times that I personally have nothing
> against sssd, just that I do not see the point in using it with Samba.
> This forum cannot support sssd because we do not produce it and know
> little about it, but it has its own ma...
2020 Jul 24
1
samba4 kerberized nfs4 with sssd ad client
...>>> Samba is robust enough.
>>>>
>>>> Note: Now that CentOS 8 where mentioned early on the list, CentOS 8
>>>> clients joined to a Samba domain using SSSD works pretty well. Some
>>>> tips at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228875.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Robert, I have said numerous times that I personally have nothing
>>> against sssd, just that I do not see the point in using it with
>>> Samba. This forum cannot support sssd because we do not produce it
>...
2020 Jul 24
0
samba4 kerberized nfs4 with sssd ad client
...d not recommend that now that the AD implementation of Samba is
> robust enough.
>
> Note: Now that CentOS 8 where mentioned early on the list, CentOS 8
> clients joined to a Samba domain using SSSD works pretty well. Some
> tips at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228875.html
>
>
>
Robert, I have said numerous times that I personally have nothing
against sssd, just that I do not see the point in using it with Samba.
This forum cannot support sssd because we do not produce it and know
little about it, but it has its own mailing list, sssd-users, that is...
2020 Jul 24
0
samba4 kerberized nfs4 with sssd ad client
...lementation of
>>> Samba is robust enough.
>>>
>>> Note: Now that CentOS 8 where mentioned early on the list, CentOS 8
>>> clients joined to a Samba domain using SSSD works pretty well. Some
>>> tips at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2020-March/228875.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Robert, I have said numerous times that I personally have nothing
>> against sssd, just that I do not see the point in using it with
>> Samba. This forum cannot support sssd because we do not produce it
>> and know little abo...
2020 Jul 24
3
samba4 kerberized nfs4 with sssd ad client
On 7/24/2020 7:25 AM, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-24 12:57, Jason Keltz via samba wrote:
>> Hi Rowland,
>>
>> In effect, I'm still using Samba on the DC, which is why I still
>> thought this was relevant on the mailing list. :)
>>
>> The reason in particular that I was looking at sssd client as opposed
>> to winbind was that?