search for: 22568

...ON__.20299 > -000006a0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.20223 > -00000671 l O .rodata 00000019 __FUNCTION__.20731 > -000006c0 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.20111 > -000006d8 l O .rodata 00000010 __FUNCTION__.22492 > -000006e8 l O .rodata 00000016 __FUNCTION__.22568 > +0000064f l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.20622 > +00000663 l O .rodata 0000000e __FUNCTION__.20214 > +000006a0 l O .rodata 00000020 __FUNCTION__.20138 > +00000671 l O .rodata 00000019 __FUNCTION__.20645 > +000006c0 l O .rodata 00000018 __FUNCTION__.20026 >...

The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the

...1.111> Supported: replaces Proxy-Authorization: DIGEST username="1019", realm="asterisk", algorithm=MD5, uri="sip:1010@192.168.200.100", nonce="499f7907", response="80ba81f6c2dc429b45c8bb6d57c9b7d6" Call-ID: 3b9c9ea24231eb6f@192.168.201.111 CSeq: 22568 INVITE User-Agent: Grandstream BT100 1.0.5.16 Max-Forwards: 70 Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 354 v=0 o=1019 1 8000 IN IP4 192.168.201.111 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 192.168.201.111 t=0 0 m=audio 5004 RTP/AVP 0 8 4 18 2 15 99...

...------- ------- ------ ac 0.79 26496 12.99 10 0.0013 aermod 18.40 1012996 16.83 10 0.0362 air 1.07 53244 7.93 10 0.0268 capacita 0.53 36728 46.43 10 0.0124 channel 0.30 22568 2.20 10 0.0214 doduc 2.03 131624 29.81 10 0.0187 fatigue 0.92 65524 9.39 10 0.0407 gas_dyn 0.76 54252 13.15 15 0.0991 induct 2.01 170684 24.56 10 0.0839 linpk 0.24...

Hi, There is any way to figure out where physically is the journal on a ext3 fs and it's size? Thanks! Jordi

...ffff7af555e <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+22622>, 0x7ffff7af5556 <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+22614>, 0x7ffff7af423d <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+17725>, 0x7ffff7af423d <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+17725>, 0x7ffff7af423d <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+17725>, 0x7ffff7af5528 <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+22568>, 0x7ffff7af2b62 <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+11874>, 0x7ffff7af2bd5 <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+11989>, 0x7ffff7af557e <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+22654>, 0x7ffff7af3113 <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+13331>, 0x7ffff7af423d <PyEval_EvalFrameEx+17725>, 0x7ffff7af3d4e <PyEval_Eva...

...; ac 0.79 26496 12.99 10 0.0013 > aermod 18.40 1012996 16.83 10 0.0362 > air 1.07 53244 7.93 10 0.0268 > capacita 0.53 36728 46.43 10 0.0124 > channel 0.30 22568 2.20 10 0.0214 > doduc 2.03 131624 29.81 10 0.0187 > fatigue 0.92 65524 9.39 10 0.0407 > gas_dyn 0.76 54252 13.15 15 0.0991 > induct 2.01 170684 24.56 10 0.0839 >...

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

...6kB 1*32kB 2*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1276kB Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: DMA32: empty Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: Normal: empty Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: HighMem: empty Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: Swap cache: add 89320, delete 86600, find 16186/22568, race 0+50 Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: Free swap = 422104kB Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: Total swap = 441776kB Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: Free swap: 422104kB Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: 18048 pages of RAM Aug 15 14:40:30 xen5etch kernel: 0 pages of HIGHMEM Aug 15 14:40:30...

?Hi, I have the next scenario: ############################################################################# SERVER SIDE? (64 bit architecture) ?############################################################################# Two Storage Machines with: HARDWARE DELL PE2900 III Intel Quad Core Xeon E5420 2,5Ghz, 2x6Mb cache, Bus 1333FSB RAM 4 GB FB 667Mhz (2x2Gb) 8 HDD 1 TB,

I can''t think of a good reason, other than it''s legacy code which hasn''t gotten around to being changed to RoR. http://rubyonrails.org/?=PHPE9568F36-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42 http://37signals.com/?=PHPE9568F36-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42 http://basecamphq.com/?=PHPE9568F36-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42 http://backpackit.com/?=PHPE9568F36-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42

...66.29 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=66936, per=1.80%, avg=9013.58, stdev=22400.18 write: io=127MB, bw=20,886KB/s, iops=5,221, runt= 6240msec slat (usec): min=4, max=13,685, avg=170.27, stdev=458.26 clat (usec): min=3, max=22,950, avg=2205.22, stdev=1358.38 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=22568, per=2.30%, avg=3842.18, stdev=8236.50 cpu : usr=0.74%, sys=17.57%, ctx=6029, majf=0, minf=25 IO depths : 1=0.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=87.5%, >=64=12.5% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=0....

...66.29 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=66936, per=1.80%, avg=9013.58, stdev=22400.18 write: io=127MB, bw=20,886KB/s, iops=5,221, runt= 6240msec slat (usec): min=4, max=13,685, avg=170.27, stdev=458.26 clat (usec): min=3, max=22,950, avg=2205.22, stdev=1358.38 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=22568, per=2.30%, avg=3842.18, stdev=8236.50 cpu : usr=0.74%, sys=17.57%, ctx=6029, majf=0, minf=25 IO depths : 1=0.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=87.5%, >=64=12.5% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=0....