Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "223d1983".
2018 Feb 03
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 10:10 +0100, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to
> merge this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting
> for? Also, were there any followups I should know about? Also,
> release notes please :-)
Eep, please can we keep the command line option for clang and the thunk
ABI
2018 Feb 01
5
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
Hi all,
I saw the retpoline mitigation landed in r323155. Are we ready to merge
this to 6.0, or are there any open issues that we're waiting for? Also,
were there any followups I should know about? Also, release notes please :-)
Thanks,
Hans
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2018 Feb 03
4
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...esign so that if we (or you)
need to split apart the implementation, there are distinct names available.
Until then, aliases seem very cheap to maintain?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180203/223d1983/attachment.html>
2018 Feb 03
2
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 164, Issue 6
...t; need to split apart the implementation, there are distinct names available.
> Until then, aliases seem very cheap to maintain?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/
> attachments/20180203/223d1983/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 00:27:13 +0000
> From: Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org>
> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at li...