search for: 2238adaa

...be a separate discussion than dropping VS > 2008 support because it's likely to be a bit more in-depth, but I'm in > favor of it. > +1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130708/2238adaa/attachment.html>

I'm in favor of dropping VS 2008 support (in fact, I thought we had already talked about doing that, but perhaps I am remembering incorrectly). I think C++11 support should be a separate discussion than dropping VS 2008 support because it's likely to be a bit more in-depth, but I'm in favor of it. ~Aaron On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Ahmed Bougacha <ahmed.bougacha at

Hi all, A few days ago, there was a report of LLVM not compiling on VS 2008, because of asymmetric std::lower_bound comparators not supported there. As noted by a few people, maybe it's time to drop VS 2008 compatibility and move the requirements to VS 2010? While there, what about going further and starting using C++11? Now seems as good a time as ever; my takeaway from that few months old