search for: 22301

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "22301".

Did you mean: 2301
2002 Dec 09
3
HTB problems
...ants: 0 tokens: 13363 ctokens: 13363 class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: prio 0 quantum 9011 rate 704Kbit ceil 1920Kbit burst 2500b/8 mpu 0b cburst 4056b/8 mpu 0b level 0 Sent 8642235 bytes 8393 pkts (dropped 2153, overlimits 0) rate 36918bps 36pps lended: 3618 borrowed: 4775 giants: 0 tokens: 22301 ctokens: 13363 the rate 36918bps was a constant rate for 10 minutes (I copyed with scp a big file). Thanks in advance, Thomas _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2006 Mar 31
0
can activesupport gem be used in "standalone" fashion?
i''m using ruby 1.8.2, rubygem 0.8.10, rails 1.0.0 where activesupport version = 1.2.5 when i try to run this in RADRail, i get a NoMethodError: require ''rubygems'' require_gem "activesupport" print Time.now + 2.days the error message is: c:/e312workspace/first/test3.rb:5: undefined method `days'' for 2:Fixnum (NoMethodError) is there a way to use
2005 Nov 07
1
General Question: WinXP autodomain?
Hello List, I am using Samba as PDC for some time now and I want do make the process of joining the domain somewhat more elegant ;) I use partimage to deploy images of my Windows XP-installation to the computers in my lab. In order to automate the process of joining these computers to the domain, I use some small perl-scripts. 1. After installing new software, etc. I have to create a new
2008 Jan 18
33
LatencyTop
I see Intel has released a new tool. Oh, it requires some patches to the kernel to record latency times. Good thing people don''t mind patching their kernels, eh? So who can write the equivalent latencytop.d the fastest? ;-) http://www.latencytop.org/ -- cburgess at qnx.com
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
....ll 15 135194 0 0.02 135161 0 0.02 135161 jcprepct.ll 6 66882 0 0.01 66849 0 0.01 66849 jcsample.ll 10 92605 0 0.02 92572 0 0.01 92572 jctrans.ll 7 83622 0 0.02 83589 0 0.02 83589 jdapimin.ll 10 76843 0 0.01 76810 0 0.01 74872 jdapistd.ll 6 62628 0 0.01 62595 0 0.01 62595 jdatadst.ll 4 22334 0 0.01 22301 0 0.01 22301 jdatasrc.ll 5 25127 0 0.01 25094 0 0.01 25094 jdcoefct.ll 10 148968 0 0.02 148935 0 0.02 148935 jdcolor.ll 7 68724 0 0.01 68691 0 0.02 68691 jddctmgr.ll 2 36578 0 0.01 36545 0 0.00 36545 jdhuff.ll 7 118444 0 0.02 118411 0 0.01 118411 jdinput.ll 8 84668 0 0.02 84635 0 0.02 84635 jdmainc...