Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "222157".
Did you mean:
2221,7
2019 Apr 01
2
selftest
> While 'make test' is intended to> pass generally, the reference environment is Ubuntu 14.04 (soon to be> upgraded to 18.04 for the next release).
By "next release," do you mean 4.10.1 or 4.11?
Looking also at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-April/222157.html,is there concern that 4.10.0 is not production-ready on Ubuntu 18.04?
2019 Apr 02
2
selftest
...eference
> > > environment is Ubuntu 14.04 (soon to be> upgraded to 18.04 for the
> > > next release).
> >
> > By "next release," do you mean 4.10.1 or 4.11?
> >
> > Looking also at
> > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-April/222157.html is there
> > concern that 4.10.0 is not production-ready on Ubuntu 18.04?
> >
>
> No, I just wasn't building Samba into the default prefix
> '/usr/local/samba', so I had to backport various Samba packages from
> 18.10 before it would build. I have no doubt...
2019 Apr 02
0
selftest
...tended to> pass generally, the reference
> > environment is Ubuntu 14.04 (soon to be> upgraded to 18.04 for the
> > next release).
>
> By "next release," do you mean 4.10.1 or 4.11?
>
> Looking also at
> https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-April/222157.html,is there
> concern that 4.10.0 is not production-ready on Ubuntu 18.04?
>
No, I just wasn't building Samba into the default prefix
'/usr/local/samba', so I had to backport various Samba packages from
18.10 before it would build. I have no doubt that if I had run
'./conf...
2019 Apr 02
0
selftest
...ent is Ubuntu 14.04 (soon to be> upgraded to 18.04 for
> > > > the next release).
> > >
> > > By "next release," do you mean 4.10.1 or 4.11?
> > >
> > > Looking also at
> > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-April/222157.html is
> > > there concern that 4.10.0 is not production-ready on Ubuntu 18.04?
> > >
> >
> > No, I just wasn't building Samba into the default prefix
> > '/usr/local/samba', so I had to backport various Samba packages from
> > 18.10 before...
2019 Apr 01
5
selftest
Thanks for the reply,
Besides the problem with
source4/lib/messaging/messaging_handlers.c,
Good to hear that selftest is actively used, then do I understand it
right that 'make test' should succeed?
My bigger problem is that it failed with lots of errors.
This must be a problem with my build, then, but since this is a fresh
tarball I am a bit puzzled.
I would appreciate some hint on