Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "222,31".
Did you mean:
222,13
2010 Apr 06
1
[PATCH v3] Add Mergeable receive buffer support to vhost_net
...0,
+ .hdr.gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE
};
+ int retries = 0;
size_t len, total_len = 0;
- int err;
+ int err, headcount, datalen;
size_t hdr_size;
struct socket *sock = rcu_dereference(vq->private_data);
if (!sock || skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))
@@ -222,31 +242,25 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *
vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(&net->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ?
vq->log : NULL;
- for (;;) {
- head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
- ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
- &out, &in,
- vq_lo...
2010 Apr 06
1
[PATCH v3] Add Mergeable receive buffer support to vhost_net
...0,
+ .hdr.gso_type = VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE
};
+ int retries = 0;
size_t len, total_len = 0;
- int err;
+ int err, headcount, datalen;
size_t hdr_size;
struct socket *sock = rcu_dereference(vq->private_data);
if (!sock || skb_queue_empty(&sock->sk->sk_receive_queue))
@@ -222,31 +242,25 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *
vq_log = unlikely(vhost_has_feature(&net->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) ?
vq->log : NULL;
- for (;;) {
- head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
- ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
- &out, &in,
- vq_lo...
2020 Apr 22
0
[PATCH hmm 5/5] mm/hmm: remove the customizable pfn format from hmm_range_fault
...*/
int hmm_vma_handle_pmd(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
- unsigned long end, uint64_t *pfns, pmd_t pmd);
+ unsigned long end, unsigned long hmm_pfns[], pmd_t pmd);
#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
static inline bool hmm_is_device_private_entry(struct hmm_range *range,
@@ -222,31 +210,31 @@ static inline bool hmm_is_device_private_entry(struct hmm_range *range,
range->dev_private_owner;
}
-static inline uint64_t pte_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *range, pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long pte_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *range,
+ pte_t pte)...
2020 May 01
0
[PATCH hmm v2 5/5] mm/hmm: remove the customizable pfn format from hmm_range_fault
...*/
int hmm_vma_handle_pmd(struct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
- unsigned long end, uint64_t *pfns, pmd_t pmd);
+ unsigned long end, unsigned long hmm_pfns[], pmd_t pmd);
#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
static inline bool hmm_is_device_private_entry(struct hmm_range *range,
@@ -222,31 +210,31 @@ static inline bool hmm_is_device_private_entry(struct hmm_range *range,
range->dev_private_owner;
}
-static inline uint64_t pte_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *range, pte_t pte)
+static inline unsigned long pte_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *range,
+ pte_t pte)...
2020 Apr 22
1
[PATCH hmm 5/5] mm/hmm: remove the customizable pfn format from hmm_range_fault
...uct mm_walk *walk, unsigned long addr,
> - unsigned long end, uint64_t *pfns, pmd_t pmd);
> + unsigned long end, unsigned long hmm_pfns[], pmd_t pmd);
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */
>
> static inline bool hmm_is_device_private_entry(struct hmm_range *range,
> @@ -222,31 +210,31 @@ static inline bool hmm_is_device_private_entry(struct hmm_range *range,
> range->dev_private_owner;
> }
>
> -static inline uint64_t pte_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *range, pte_t pte)
> +static inline unsigned long pte_to_hmm_pfn_flags(struct hmm_range *ra...
2020 Apr 22
11
[PATCH hmm 0/5] Adjust hmm_range_fault() API
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
The API is a bit complicated for the uses we actually have, and
disucssions for simplifying have come up a number of times.
This small series removes the customizable pfn format and simplifies the
return code of hmm_range_fault()
All the drivers are adjusted to process in the simplified format.
I would appreciated tested-by's for the two
2020 May 01
13
[PATCH hmm v2 0/5] Adjust hmm_range_fault() API
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
The API is a bit complicated for the uses we actually have, and
disucssions for simplifying have come up a number of times.
This small series removes the customizable pfn format and simplifies the
return code of hmm_range_fault()
All the drivers are adjusted to process in the simplified format.
I would appreciated tested-by's for the two
2013 Jan 23
132
[PATCH 00/45] initial arm v8 (64-bit) support
First off, Apologies for the massive patch series...
This series boots a 32-bit dom0 kernel to a command prompt on an ARMv8
(AArch64) model. The kernel is the same one as I am currently using with
the 32 bit hypervisor
I haven''t yet tried starting a guest or anything super advanced like
that ;-). Also there is not real support for 64-bit domains at all,
although in one or two places I
2013 Feb 22
48
[PATCH v3 00/46] initial arm v8 (64-bit) support
This round implements all of the review comments from V2 and all patches
are now acked. Unless there are any objections I intend to apply later
this morning.
Ian.