Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "220kbit".
Did you mean:
200kbit
2004 Dec 21
18
Weighted packet shaping?
Hi all,
Im new to all this, and am still trying to get my head qround some of the
concepts of how this all works.
Ive read the howto''s, man pages etc.
Ive setup packet shaping on my router/server box using HTB and SFQ, but its not
working the way i would like.
Im after shaping that has "weights" for classes so that a lower priority class
will slow down when a higher class
2007 Aug 22
6
simple tbf rate clamping issues
Hello,
I was attempting to throttle egress traffic to a specific rate using a
tbf. As a starting point I used an example from the LARTC howto, which
goes:
tc qdisc add dev eth1 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540
I then attempt a large fetch from another machine via wget (~40 megs)
and the rate was clamped down to about 12Kbytes/s. As this seemed too
much, I gradually increased the latency up to 200ms which then gave me
the expected results (~34Kbytes/s).
I then applied this qu...
2005 Apr 26
8
HTB Weird Shaping Question(Bug?). Please Help!
...udp
traffic(generated by the VoIP applications) to 1:110. I continously
generate ping traffic on the computer and the router to a remote
computer in the ISP network. The pings from the computer are classified
as 1:105, while the pings from the router are classified as 1:800. The
max uplink speed is 220Kbit determined by observation.
In the first test, I limit the SUBCLASS_OUTRATE to 200Kbit. Both pings
are around 20ms before I start the VoIP services. However, once I start
the services, the pings jump up to 1800ms.
In the second test, I limit the SUBCLASS_OUTRATE to 180Kbit. The pings
jump up to 80...
2002 Feb 03
1
simple traffic shaping problem
Hi All,
I read the advanced networking howto and find a useful way to shape my
adsl link.
is says:
"tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1500
[...]
Change 220kbit to your uplinks *actual* speed, minus a few percent. If
you have a really fast modem, raise ''burst'' a bit. "
My adsl''s upload brandwidth is about 120 kbits/sec, download brandwidth
is about 384 kbits/sec.
So I use
tc...
2006 Jan 16
1
Question about TBF burst parameter
Hi,
I am a completely newbie, and have been doing intense reading for the entire
last week, and have the following novice question:
In section 9.2.2.2. of LARTC HOWTO, the following sample configuration
given:
# tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540
Why is the burst parameter value determined to be 1540?
Thanks,
Todd
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2004 May 04
3
shape outgoing/upload traffic PER-IP.
...imit the upload with 100kbit per user. Ex:
192.168.1.20 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP
192.168.1.21 ----> 1024kbit-DOWN / 100kbit-UP
and so on.......
Ive tried CBQ and HTB, but couldnt get is right. the only thing that I did in upload bases was:
"tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root tbf rate 220kbit latency 50ms burst 1540"
witch is for the whole interface. not for a simple IP.
Thanks a lot.
Cristiano Soares
2003 Nov 13
1
HTB traffic shaping + squid cache proxy
...> /dev/null
$TC qdisc del dev ppp0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null
$IPTABLES -F POSTROUTING -t mangle
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 r2q 2
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 248Kbit burst 35k
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 220Kbit ceil 240Kbit burst 25k prio 0
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:30 htb rate 28Kbit ceil 28Kbit burst 10k prio 1
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 11: sfq perturb 10
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:30 handle 33: sfq perturb 10
$IPTABLES -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s ! 192....
2007 Jul 04
1
infinite amount of data for HTB burst
...l flows, "p2p" and
"!p2p". The entire desktop-to-inet traffic should be
constrained to 240kbit/s. If the two flows don''t compete for
this 240kbit/s (their combined upload stays below
240kbit/s), then each can use whatever it feels like (for
example, "p2p" uses 220kbit/s, "!p2p" uses 10kbit/s). If
they do compete, then "p2p" should be constrained to
140kbit/s, and "!p2p" should be constrained to 100kbit/s.
For (1), I chose PRIO, for (2), I chose HTB.
legend: [qdisc], (class)
[1:0 PRIO, 2 bands]...
2005 Jan 08
2
script
...dev/null
$TC qdisc del dev eth1 ingress 2> /dev/null > /dev/null
$IPTABLES -F POSTROUTING -t mangle
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 50 r2q 2
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 248Kbit burst 35k
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 220Kbit ceil 240Kbit burst 25k prio 0
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:30 htb rate 28Kbit ceil 28Kbit burst 10k prio 1
$TC class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:60 htb rate 1Kbit ceil 100Mbit prio 1
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 11: sfq perturb 10
$TC qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1...
2005 Jan 19
11
Confuse, putting packets in wrong mangle table.
Folks,
I am a little bit confuse in how to put these packets into correct mangle
table for traffic shaping.
This is what i ve planned to do:
- - - - :eth0 [ LINUX-BOX ] eth1: - - - -
Let say:
eth0: 220.100.1.1
eth1: 192.168.1.1
eth1:1 192.168.1.2
192.168.1.0/24 get natted into 220.100.1.1 before reaching the internet.
I put every packets coming from internet (eth0) this way:
# iptables -t