search for: 22.000

Hi all Consider the classic data below from Darwin on the heights of 15 pairs of zea mays (corn) plants either cross-fertilized or self-fertilized, where the goal is to see if it makes a difference. > head(ZeaMays) pair pot cross self diff 1 1 1 23.500 17.375 6.125 2 2 1 12.000 20.375 -8.375 3 3 1 21.000 20.000 1.000 4 4 2 22.000 20.000 2.000 5 5 2 19.125

I am doing a backup daily of Samba4 and my doubt is about the growing of its database. I have on my network about 100 computers and users, and a fileserver 2008 R2, some GPO?s (for time ...). All working fine, thanks. I need some information about main file of the Samba4, it?s actual size is now about 22.000 kbytes, but growing everyday, even when I do not include a computer, user or change

Dear all, I am encountering some issues with my data and need some help. I am trying to run glm analysis with a presence/absence variable as response variable and several explanatory variable (time, location, presence/absence data, abundance data). First I tried to use the glm() function, however I was having 2 warnings concerning glm.fit () : # 1: glm.fit: algorithm did not converge # 2:

Hi, I am trying to get faster search results on our webmail client(Roundcube). Besides using Lucene for FTS are there other options? Would having all mails indexed give fast results? Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how much faster are we looking at? Really appreciate if someone could advise about this. Thanks Kevin

> * Kevin Laurie <superinterstellar at gmail.com> 2015.01.24 19:41: > > > Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed > how > > much faster are we looking at? > > With a current version of Dovecot a search is pretty fast _without_ using > external indexes. I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 > messages in it,

* Peter Hodur <petehodur at gmail.com> 2015.01.29 05:25: > > With a current version of Dovecot a search is pretty fast _without_ using > > external indexes. I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 > > messages in it, and searching the full view only takes 2.5 seconds: > > > > > hmmm, could you please tell me more about your setup? What

Thomas Leuxner: > I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 messages in it interesting. I assume you drop multiple mailing lists together in a mailbox and separate them using the virtual plugin, right? could publish how you configured dovecot virtual plugin? I never had success on using the plugin in a useful way :-/ Thanks Andreas

Dear Peter, My inbox is MDA_external Storage: 17GB of 24GB Subject / From / To is fast but FTS(Full Text Search) for body is horrible. I suppose this is where we need Apache Solr. Do you think my mail storage format is bad? Do I need to change for better performance? Please advise Kevin On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Peter Hodur <petehodur at gmail.com> wrote: > > * Kevin

Hi all, I'm working with a bunch of large graphs, and stumbled across something useful. Probably many of you know this, but I didn't and so others might benefit. Using pch="." speeds up plotting considerably over using symbols. > x <- runif(1000000) > y <- runif(1000000) > system.time(plot(x, y, pch=".")) user system elapsed 1.042 0.030 1.077

* Kevin Laurie <superinterstellar at gmail.com> 2015.01.24 19:41: > Currently the time it takes to search 25,000mails is 4mins. If indexed how > much faster are we looking at? With a current version of Dovecot a search is pretty fast _without_ using external indexes. I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 messages in it, and searching the full view only takes 2.5

Dear Peter, Noted. Thanks for your input. Appreciate it. At this point my urgent most priority is to get FTS. Waiting 3 mins for a body search email is bad(but of course my email box is large) I need to have this sorted out by today as I have been putting this off for too long mostly because of lack of troubleshooting documentation online(if i do figure this out will create some for guidance)

Hello together, this is ma first post, so please aplogize me if post this in the wrong section. I have problem concerning ma two matrizes. After a regressione and so on, I got two matrizes Matrixres contains the results of ma calculation. Matrixr contains my detiene, which where Aldo used for the regression. Please ser the following code: #Datei einlesen residual =

Hi Micheal, Here is how it should look:- ~# telnet localhost imap Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. . login user at domain.net password . OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS

Hi Thomas, That's very interesting. Below is my search result. Any idea why is my result so slow:- Appreciate if you could advise. Thanks Kevin . OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT MULTIAPPEND URL-PARTIAL CATENATE UNSELECT CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1 CONDSTORE